« The Rabbi's Rabbi | Main | Be Good to my Daughter »
June 29, 2006
Shabbos Shattered
My father-in-law, HaRav, HaGaon Pinchas Zvi Singer ZT'L, was a brilliant Torah scholar, and perhaps one of the finest speakers the American rabbinate has ever produced. Less well known are Rav Singer's "Paper Pulpit" writings.
Published quarterly by Congregation B'nai Isaac, "The Shofar" lists candle lighting times, and the shul's calendar. My father-in-law also wrote a brief, but inevitably sagacious essay for each and every issue. Thus Rav Singer, for close to fifty years, transformed a somewhat conventional shul hand-out into a first-class Torah journal that seamlessly blended scholarly thought with lovingly rendered personal musings.
This morning, I stepped into my office and found a past issue of "The Paper Pulpit" in my fax machine. I have no idea who sent it to me -- but I thank you.
I vividly remember the incident described by my father-in-law for it was deeply traumatic -- not only for Rav Singer, but for Ariel ZT'Lwho witnessed the violent and bloody episode.
********************************************************************************************************************************************
The Paper Pulpit
by
Rabbi Philip Harris Singer
September 2002/ Tishrei 5763
On Saturday, June 1st, 2002 my Shabbos was shattered. It was late afternoon and I was returning to shul for Minchah services and the Seudoh Shlishis. As I walked on West 10th Street with my son-in-law, Yitzchok and my grandson, Ariel, I was attacked by a vicious white dog, and he bit me on my hand.
This was a traumatic experience -- shocking and painful. I was going to shul, and ended up in the Emergency Room of Maimonides Hospital. What was also hurtful was the callous and unsympathetic actions and attitudes of the owners of the dog.
At the hospital the wound was stitched up and treated. It is healing. But the imprint of the bite with a scar will remain.
When I phoned the police 62nd precinct a few days later for the report number, someone said to me, "Rabbi, you called 911 on Shabbos?" This opened a wound that is not healing. I didn't personally call 911, and according to Halachah it was permitted.
Yet I was reminded that the Shabbos was disturbed and desecrated. Not only did I not pray Minchah, participate in the Torah reading and partake in the Seudoh Shlishis, but, instead I rode on Shabbos with my son-in-law in the ambulance.
The physical pain persists, but it has no comparison to the gnawing spiritual anguish of the Chilul Shabbos: The Shabbos was profaned and nullified.
It is a sin, "all the ininquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgressions, even all their sins." (Leviticus 16:21). "Iniquities" are insolent misdeeds; "transgressions" are rebellious acts; "sins" are unwitting offenses.
A sin is a burden on the soul. Forgiveness and atonement are gained only through repentance. Thus this year Rosh Hashonah and Yom Kippur are vital and urgent. But repentance does not have to wait for the High Holidays.
Today is the time.
Traditionally, a woman who usually lights two Shabbos candles every Friday evening and she misses one Shabbos because of child birth, from then on she is obligated to light one additional candle every Friday evening. So too, if one more Jew in our community would begin to observe the Shabbos it would assauge my torment and sorrow. It would make you a happier Jew. Join the repentance and the Almighty will bless all with a Happy New Year.
Posted by Robert J. Avrech at June 29, 2006 10:19 AM
Comments
Seraphic Secret is private property, that's right, it's an extension of our home, and as such, Karen and I have instituted two Seraphic Rules and we ask commentors to act respectfully.
1. No profanity.2. No Israel bashing. We debate, we discuss, we are respectful. You know what Israel bashing is. The world is full of it. Seraphic Secret is one of the few places in the world that will not tolerate this form of anti-Semitism. That's it. Break either of these rules and you will be banned.
I remember the story - Ariel ZT'L ran and ran, and brought his grandfather a glass of water, even though he was weakened. Bless.
Posted by: Jackie at June 29, 2006 12:23 PM
Jackie:
Yes, Ariel's lungs were in very bad shape when this terrible incident took place. It was a miracle that he ran those three full city blocks--back and forth. But he loved his grandfather dearly, was stunned and frightened by the wound, and as if on the wings of eagles, our child flew when walking such a distance made him pant with fatigue.
Posted by: Robert J. Avrech
at June 29, 2006 12:40 PM
I know the point of Rabbi Singer's ZT"L message was about the sanctity of Shabbat, and it was a beautiful one. But allow me to expand it slightly to include a few thoughts about the sanctity of human life and how this story of a dog attack confirms some of the fears I have:
I have nothing against animals, but the deference given to dogs and cats at the expense of innocent human beings in this country is truly frightening. Let me give you an example. Not far from my home, a four year-old boy was recently mauled close to death by a dog. That dog had attacked people before and its owner was warned more than once. But once again, his dog "got out" and almost killed a little boy. What's the worst that can happen to this guy under state law? Well, the dog MAY be put down, (unlikely), and the owner MAY be fined or successfully sued in civil court for a nominal (capped) amount. As the father of a toddler in a suburban area with lots of dogs, I'm not happy.
At the same time, a man in another town near my house was arrested for killing a neighbor's cat. The cat had been destroying some of his property for some time and he just snapped and poisoned it. Deplorable behavior to be sure, but guess what is going to happen to him? Legal experts tell me the chances are better than 90% that he will go to jail for a significant term. You see, killing pets is a serious crime in New York.
I don't know about you, but the message this all sends about respecting human life above all else is chilling. There are a growing number of irresponsible pet owners in this country, (and it sounds like we can include the people who owned the dog that attacked Rabbi Singer ZT"L to that list), and the laws need to be changed to frighten these people, not everyone else.
Posted by: Jake at June 29, 2006 12:58 PM
Jake:
Agree with you completely. The owner of the dog who bit Rav Singer looked at the bloody wound and shrugged. He could not be bothered. His main concern was with his dog, that it not be "put down" because of this "accident."
And of course, the dog is still alive, still dangerous.
The so-called "animal rights" movement is part and parcel of the moral inversion that grips some liberal minds.
There are now terrorists who would (and will) kill scientists who experiment on animals, yet these same people support abortion -- this points to a moral perversity that is perhaps unparralleled in human thought.
POLITICAL DIGRESSION: I can guarantee that if homosexual marriage is legalized, the very next step will be the demand that people have the right to marry their "pet partners."
And why not, if love and affection is all that matters, well, who is to say that human/animal unions are wrong? If the life of a human being is worth the same as, say a chicken, as Professor Singer of Princeton University the father of the animal rights movement constantly reminds us, how can marriage between human and animal be morally objectionable? END POLITICAL DIGRESSION.
Jake, I want to thank you and Adar for taking the trouble to schlep all the way to Bensonhurst to pay a shiva call to Karen and her family. It was wonderful to finally meet your lovely wife--I only wish it was under happier circumstances.
Posted by: Robert J. Avrech
at June 29, 2006 01:26 PM
Robert,
I know this isn't the point of the story, but I was a little perturbed about the sense of guilt for calling 911 and "profaning" the shabbos. It's my understanding that we are allowed to do anything to save a life on shabbos and should not have to feel bad about it. I've done so in the past for relatives (riding in an ambulance and making phone calls) and while it's not something you want to have to do, I certainly didn't feel the need to do teshuvah for it.
Posted by: mata hari at June 29, 2006 05:59 PM
Mata Hari:
I understand your feelings completely. But this is the madrega of a Gadoi, of a Tzaddik. People like Rav Singer exist on an entirely different spiritual level than ordinary Jews like you and me.
Posted by: Robert J. Avrech
at June 29, 2006 10:17 PM
That has brought back a nasty memory of mine, of something that occurred a couple of years ago when I walked into a pub in London for a beer on a hot day. A woman was there with a dog, and as I walked past the dog barked at me, and then jumped at me and bit me when I recoiled at the bark. I was not badly hurt (although the trousers I was wearing were ruined), but the owner of the dog them proceeded to get angry with me for upsetting her dog. I then lost my temper completely, and said some extremely rude things to the woman in question which I really wish I hadn't.
I haven't lost my temper so completely since, and I consider losing my temper to be amongst the worst of all possible personal failings, and I walked out of the pub feeling extremely angry with myself for doing so. However, I still find the circumstances (in which someone got angry with me for being bitten by her dog) to be extraordinary.
Sorry Robert, I am rambling here. It sounds like your father in law was a very good man, and I am very sorry to hear about his death.
Posted by: Michael Jennings at June 30, 2006 04:34 AM
Robert, I hope that from time to time you will post more of the Rabbi's writings. Did he have any work published which is suitable for laypersons? His writing style is beautiful, his insights subtle and profound.
Posted by: Tamara at June 30, 2006 06:36 AM
Michael:
I've heard stories like yours many times. I don't attribute this kind of craziness to any political movement, it's just that people often get irrational when it comes to their pets. Now we have more cases of people keeping Tigers and pythons in their apartments. And of course, we know that Hitler was crazy about animals, especially his dogs.
Look, I love my daughter more than anything, but if she ever bit someone I'd be mortified beyond belief and she'd be very severely punished.
I wish this was just about politics, but some people are just jerks.
Posted by: Jake at June 30, 2006 07:28 AM
Tamara:
Rav Singer ZT'L left mountains of writings behind. Many are in classical Hebrew. He was working on editing Ariel's ZT'L Talmud notebooks at the time of his death, and there are volumes in gorgeous Yiddish. Of course there are the Paper Pulpit writings in English.
David, Karen's brother, Karen and I plan on editing and publishing Rav Singer's writings here on Seraphic Secret over the next few years, yes. However, it will take us a while to gather the material, go through it, and of course, type it up. My father-in-law was old school: he wrote using a fountain pen.
Posted by: Robert J. Avrech
at June 30, 2006 09:59 AM
Michael:
Very sorry to hear about your dog incident. I do not agree with you that losing one's temper is such a terrible personal failing. In fact, I'm running the Ten Commandments through my brain right now and you know what -- it's not there. Unless of course, you lose your temper and then murder someone, lose your temper and then dishonor your parents, lose your temper and start worshiping idols.
You get my drift.
Look, we're all human -- being physically assaulted is a most shocking and frightening experience. I consider it perfectly appropriate to lose your temper, especially when the dog's owner reacts in such a vile and unsympathetic manner. Personally, I would have punched the dog owner and then killed the dog.
Sorry, now I'm rambling.
Thanks so much for your condolences. We have not heard from you in a long time and as always, it's very good to hear from our very favorite Libertarian.
Posted by: Robert J. Avrech
at June 30, 2006 10:13 AM
Robert,
I understand your response to Mati Hara, but I hope all readers understand that in certain circumstances one is obligated to call an ambulance. If waranted (piku'ah nefesh), it is a mitzvah, and not in any way hilul shabbat.
I would wake up my wife to read her the last paragraph, but she would probably kill me if she knew I were blogging at this hour (or period?).
You wrote that Reb Gershon was "armed to the teeth." Is this literally or literary license?
Shavu'ah tov
Posted by: Ari Kinsberg at July 2, 2006 12:40 AM
Ari:
You are quitre right, one is obligated to call an ambulance under certain circumstances as was done for Rav Singer.
Reb Gershon was literally armed. Highwaymen were a terrible problem and he was constantly forced to defend himself on the roads in Italy and in Greece.
Posted by: Robert J. Avrech
at July 2, 2006 08:22 AM
