« Palis Aren't Broke | Main | The Smugness of the War's Opponents »
November 13, 2006
Where's Karen? Plus: Thoughts on Screenwriting
Sunday morning. Beverly Hills. I'm attending a 25th wedding anniversary party for close friends from shul. The backyard is a a dream conjured by a dream. An azure lap pool shimmers under the cauterizing morning sun. Further down are basketball and tennis courts.
The waiters in crisp black and white uniforms are straight from central casting--out of work actors. The male waiters have lantern jaws, and each waitress is thin as a sheaf of wheat.
I'm sitting at a table by the pool, sipping a Cafe Latte, and worrying about a deep structural problem in a movie outline I'm working on. Always, it takes me longer to write the ten page outline than the hundred and fifteen page screenplay.
Movies are all about structure. Internal narrative logic.
For me, dialogue is easier. Those words flow like water down a hill. Often I smile, hum, weave and bop in my desk chair as I compose snappy dialogue. It's fun. But I torture myself over structure; the trick is to include just the right amount of exposition, yet it should not feel like exposition. My scripts are (hopefully) so tight that if I remove even one crucial plot scene--inevitably everything collapses. Sometimes, I wake up in the middle of the night and realize that I can make the structure better, leaner, smarter, but it will mean ripping apart everything, and starting all over again. I try and convince myself that it's not worth it, that the revisions will not be that much better. But in the end, I almost always overcome my hesitations, my fear, my laziness, and make those drastic revisions.
Writing is rewriting.
This is the mantra that lives and courses through my bloodstream.
The best screenwriters are the ones who are willing to throw away draft after draft until, somehow, thay have made the right creative decisions. It's all about the intersection of craft, instinct, and experience.
This obsessive urge to make my work better, to make it, well, perfect, takes up a huge amount of my brain's real estate. I am also acutely aware that from my end, a not inconsiderable number of my daily interactions and conversations are tainted by the endless screenwriting and creative churnings of my mind. I am with people but all too often -- in body only.
It is, to put it mildly, exhausting.
A friend from shul, a physician, sits beside me. He looks at me for a long moment as if he doesn't quite recognize me:
"Where's Karen?"
"She's in avelut (mourning)."
"Right, right, I forgot. Sorry. I'm so used to seeing you two together..."
"Tell me about it."
The doctor's wife says: "Robert, aren't you going to eat anything?"
"Um, no, Karen's not here."
My friend and his wife look at me for a long moment, not quite comprehending.
Jump Cut:
A lawyer and his wife sit down at my table.
"Robert?"
""Uh-huh."
"Where's Karen?"
"She's in avelut."
"Oh, right. I'm so sorry. I forgot. That was about two months ago, right?"
"More like five months ago."
"Whoops, sorry."
"Aren't you going to eat?" The lawyer's wife says.
"Nope, not without Karen here."
"Do you know how strange that sounds?" she says.
"Believe me, I'm well aware."
Jump Cut:
My stockbroker sits beside me.
"Where's Karen?"
"She's in avelut."
"Oh right, I forgot, forgive me."
"No problem."
"She didn't sit shiva here in Los Angeles so it wasn't as much on my radar."
"Perfectly understandable. Listen shop talk. Now that the Democrats are in power is my portfolio going to take a dive?"
"Hmm, perhaps some of your pharmaceuticals, but not Amgen, that's holding strong. In general the politics are uncertain and the market likes uncertaintly. I think we'll be fine for the forseeable future."
"Okay, thanks"
My stockbroker's wife says: "Robert, aren't you going to eat?"
"No, Karen's not here."
She gazes at me wide-eyed.
"I'll grab the wrong food, poison myself." I explain sheepishly.
"Odd seeing you without Karen," she observes
"Y'think?"
Jump Cut:
My friend Danny sits beside me. His wife is also in avelut. We look at each other and grin.
Danny asks: "You going to Israel next week?"
"Yup. Gonna spend Thanksgiving in Jerusalem. Take Offspring #3 for a nice American style Thanksgiving meal."
"Cool. Me too."
"I hear you take pills on the plane and sleep the whole way to Israel."
"Sixteen-hour flight. You bet. I take Ambien. What about you?"
"Proust."
"Huh. Never heard of that drug. Is it new?"
"French writer. Wrote one book, seven volumes, a million words. Twenty pages in and I am so out. He's like a massive dose of Ambien."
Danny laughs. He says to me, "So what's it like, you know, this whole social whirl without Karen."
I point an index finger to my head and squeeze an imaginary trigger.
"Kaboom," I growl.
Danny laughs. "I hear ya. Boy, do I ever I hear ya."
Karen Adds:
Robert might have been embarrassed to include the most important impediment to his partaking of the lavish brunch. He told me the food was served as a buffet, and this meant standing in line, and choosing from a vast array of dishes. This presents two challenges. First, Robert hates crowds, and can't tolerate any massing of humans. Second, he has trouble identifying foods, especially those that might be strongly spiced. I am his food censor and line-crasher. So, I guess he just decided to avoid the possibility of eating something that might set off a migraine. Don't worry, I'm sure if he was really hungry he would have drummed up the courage.
Posted by Robert J. Avrech at November 13, 2006 09:16 AM
Comments
Seraphic Secret is private property, that's right, it's an extension of our home, and as such, Karen and I have instituted two Seraphic Rules and we ask commentors to act respectfully.
1. No profanity.2. No Israel bashing. We debate, we discuss, we are respectful. You know what Israel bashing is. The world is full of it. Seraphic Secret is one of the few places in the world that will not tolerate this form of anti-Semitism. That's it. Break either of these rules and you will be banned.
What do I say, Robert? This is sadly funny, or funnily sad?
Can I interest you in a nice plain omelet, perhaps? No harm can come of that.
Am so glad to hear that you'll be traveling to Eretz Yisroel. Remember, the Hebrew word for Turkey is "Tarnegol Hodu"--that's what you'll want to order.
Posted by: Pearl at November 13, 2006 12:23 PM
Pearl:
What can I say but I'm, you know, food disabled. When Offspring #2 was in Sem I was there for Thanksgiving too. Y'see a pattern emerging?
Posted by: Robert J. Avrech
at November 13, 2006 12:32 PM
That's a beautiful post about the mourning period, the time when life both stops and goes on. After reading this post, I looked at your side bar where you said that "People tell us that time heals, but Karen and I know that is not true. Time grinds away doing its terrible work." My father's death did teach me one peculiar thing about time, which is that its passage brings your loved one closer to you, not further away.
When my Dad first died, I couldn't bear to think about him because the hurt was too raw. Now, more than a decade later, I think about him constantly. I miss him a lot, but I'm able to revisit him in my mind without the sense of loss being so strong that I shy away. Whether I'm writing, spending time with my children, taking a hike, whatever, I can visit memories of him and share them with those around me. He's closer to me now than he has been in years.
I have no idea whether that sense of time and closeness is different when you lose a child, as opposed to a parent. I only know that, for me, time's softening effect has been very helpful.
Posted by: Bookworm at November 13, 2006 02:40 PM
Bookworm:
Thanks so much for your beautiful and lovingly observed comment. Karen and I have learned that grief has no fixed pattern. It is a far shore that plays itself out differently for most everyone.
As for time's softening the loss, well, for our Ariel ZT'L, this effect has not yielded the predicted result. In fact, only now, three years after our beloved son's death, have the raw materials of grief been translated into an overwhelming emotional tsumani. Yes, a wall of denial can be that strong.
Posted by: Robert J. Avrech
at November 13, 2006 04:22 PM
Dear Robert,
It really hit me tonight how immeasureably fortunate you are to have Ariel's "mother as your wife."
I know what it's like to raise a child only to have him snatched away, as it were, right at the edge of young adulthood, and just as you were about to reap the harvest of a son having grown up into a (man)tsch, catastrophe befell you and Karen and all who both knew nad loved your son.
So much of the literature about the effect of a child's loss on the stability of marriage argues that bad marriages become worse and worse marriages end up in divorce.
In my own case, Ben's mom and I were already divorced for nearly two years when Ben left us. Aside from a brief moment at the hospital when I told her, Ben's mom is really the only person in my (former?) family with whom I have never grieved-as peculiar as that may sound.
I guess my point, however obtuse, is that the woman you have loved since you were a mere lad of ten years, remains-not only Ariel's mom but your beloved despite tragedy, mourning and interminable grief- though I am sure that you and Karen have had your bad days since as well!
I write this note tonight as a reflection-not only of my obvious empathy for your and Karen's loss, but as a thank you for the enormous benefit your words have had on me these two years since having learned about your blog from a friend.
Finally, forgive me for sounding so maudlin on this, the eve of the 6th Hebrew yartzeit of Benjamin Z'L.
I remain ...
Very Sincerely yours,
Alan D. Busch
Posted by: alan at November 13, 2006 05:31 PM
Alan:
Thanks so much for writing. Yes, odd as it sounds, I am lucky. Without Karen's strength and solid core, I would spin away into the black coreners of the universe. Too, I serve as an anchor for Karen when her grief descends and becomes a blinding darkness.
I have read "The Book of Ben." I can only imagine what it took for you to compose this elegy for your beloved son. Each loss is so different. Each such a unique tragedy that there is no way to wholly comprehend the grief the other is feeling. All that's left is to be an honest witness and say: "Yes, I hear. Yes, I will try and help you keep those memories alive."
Posted by: Robert J. Avrech
at November 13, 2006 06:07 PM
I can only add to Robert's comments that my grief is forever surprising me in that with time I realize how defended I have been in the first few years. The loss has been so grave, so wounding, so shattering to my essential being that I could not absorb it. I actually became a stranger to my own son in a way. My memories were hazy, my connection was somehow distant -- just not cohesive or coherent. Now as time passes the paradox is that I feel closer to Ariel. I feel his presence, and I miss him even more. Somehow the defenses have thawed and I have reconnected and I can imagine him in my life again. Now I am bereft and I realize what has happened and I after THREE years it has hit me. My dear Ariel is gone forever. I can touch the pain and like a person who touches a hot stove I recoil -- there is no choice. The alternative is constant pain.
Posted by: Karen Avrech at November 13, 2006 09:00 PM
I haven't the proper words to share, so I'll just say good post.
Posted by: Jack at November 13, 2006 10:45 PM
Jack:
Thanks so much, very kind of you.
Posted by: Robert J. Avrech
at November 14, 2006 12:21 AM
It's strange how a person becomes so attached to his loved ones that it soon becomes very uncomfortable to be without them. I feel a very painful absence whenever I go out without Adar, however infrequent that occurs or insignificant the event. To tell you the truth, it's kind of a nice feeling to want to share everything with someone.
Posted by: Jake at November 14, 2006 07:44 AM
Jake:
At the anniversary party I was watching a friend who is no longer married. In fact, he was involved in a pretty bitter divorce. I tried to imagine what it's like living with someone you don't love, what it's like living with someone who you don't want to "share everything."
I have to tell you, I was riven with a kind of black fear that is truly horrifying.
Posted by: Robert J. Avrech
at November 14, 2006 09:19 AM
Robert, as you know, it's this kind of writing that first brought me to S.S. and coming back over and over.
The words that you and Karen share reach right into my soul.
Thank you for so honestly expressing your feelings of grief...you may never know the extent to which your words have touched those of us who read here.
Posted by: cruisin-mom at November 14, 2006 09:49 AM
Cruisin' Mom:
It's a particular pleasure to hear from you for along with Jackie Danicki, Toronto Pearl and Jake Novak, you are one of Seraphic Secret's earliest readers and commenters. That every once in a while we manage to graze your soul with our thoughts and words profoundly moves us. We hope this friendship, born of words, nourished by Babke, the Ariel Avrech Memorial Lecture, the Los Angeles Gun Club and most recently the delicious Meat Grilling, will continue to flourish on-line and off.
Posted by: Robert J. Avrech
at November 14, 2006 11:09 AM
Very moving and evocative. Perhaps the upcoming Thanksgiving in Israel will be a "family reunion" in more ways than one?
(also, Those are simple but great bits of advice. For some reason structure comes more instinctively; dialogue is difficult.)
Posted by: Jeremiah at November 14, 2006 12:36 PM
Jeremiah:
Thanks so much, glad you enjoyed this posting. It's ironic that my more torturous hours consistently yield Seraphic Secret's most popular blogs.
I'm sure our Thanksgiving in Israel will cede mountains of literary gold.
It is odd how dialogue--delightful and often just a vacation romp for me--is a bloody Joan of Arc torture for some of my screenwriting buddies. But I know of no one, absolutely not one writer who finds structure "easy." At least no one who writes quality films or TV.
Posted by: Robert J. Avrech
at November 14, 2006 01:33 PM
"The words that you and Karen share reach right into my soul..."
Robert, Randi is sooooooo right. Those words of yours are inspirational -- as a result I've written poems in the past two years that come from somewhere deep in me, often a place I didn't know even existed. Sometimes I think I have a seraphic angel sitting on my shoulder as I create these poems...
Posted by: Pearl at November 14, 2006 05:49 PM
Pearl:
Funny, I'm sure I speak for Karen when I say that we never reach for "inspiration" when setting down our thoughts. But we are glad to know that every once in a while we seem to hit the right note. We should probably gather your poems here on Seraphic Secret and share them with all our readers. What do you think?
Posted by: Robert J. Avrech
at November 14, 2006 07:00 PM
Your blog is a vehicle for you and your writing, not for me and my poetry. You were kind enough to publish one in The Book of Ariel...that was a beautiful way to share, as well.
As a matter of fact, I just submitted two of the "Ariel" poems for consideration for the next issue of PARCHMENT, hopefully coming out in the spring -- as there were not enough funds to publish it in the fall, which is when its launch usually coincides with the Toronto Jewish Book Fair. My poem "Soul Light," which was published in last year's issue of PARCHMENT, was also an "Ariel" poem.
Posted by: Pearl at November 14, 2006 07:29 PM
Pearl:
Do keep us informed as to the progress of Parchment and your beautiful poems.
Posted by: Robert J. Avrech
at November 14, 2006 07:59 PM
I liked this piece. I recall your writing sometime ago about speaking to a school and telling them the writing/rewriting mantra. I hold of that rule... Wait, let me write that...That rule strikes me as true... OK - last try: So true.
Posted by: rabbi neil fleischmann at November 15, 2006 07:01 AM
