« Poison Plot c/o Pardoned Fatah Terrorists c/o Olmert | Main | Joy »

April 15, 2008

The Persecution of Brigitte Bardot

Bardot, Shalako.jpg
Brigitte Bardot in Shalako, 1968

The Orwellian persecution of the great film icon Brigitte Bardot continues. Freedom of speech is dead in France. Bardot is being prosecuted—for the fifth time—for insulting Islam.

Meanwhile, Jew-hating Imams safely spew hatred and call for violence from hundreds of mosques in France and all across Europe. The gutless French choose to repeatedly persecute the one woman in France who dares speak the truth about Muslim jihadists.

Seraphic Secret has long maintained that within two or three generation—unless the French radically reform her policies of appeasement—France will be an Islamic State ruled by Sharia. Jews are now emigrating from France to Israel, America and Canada in record numbers.

The larger question is: How long before Europe becomes Eurabia? Make no mistake about it, all of Europe is in play.

French former film star Brigitte Bardot went on trial on Tuesday for insulting Muslims, the fifth time she has faced the charge of "inciting racial hatred" over her controversial remarks about Islam and its followers.

Prosecutors asked that the Paris court hand the 73-year-old former sex symbol a two-month suspended prison sentence and fine her 15,000 euros ($23,760) for saying the Muslim community was "destroying our country and imposing its acts."
Since retiring from the film industry in the 1970s, Bardot has become a prominent animal rights activist but she has also courted controversy by denouncing Muslim traditions and immigration from predominantly Muslim countries.
She has been fined four times for inciting racial hatred since 1997, at first 1,500 euros and most recently 5,000.
Prosecutor Anne de Fontette told the court she was seeking a tougher sentence than usual, adding, "I am a little tired of prosecuting Mrs. Bardot."
Bardot did not attend the trial because she said she was physically unable to. The verdict is expected in several weeks.

Complete article at Ynetnews.

Bardot+flower.jpg
BB says: “I am fed up with being under the thumb of this population
which is destroying us...”

Scans courtesy of Dr. Macro.

Posted by Robert J. Avrech at April 15, 2008 02:57 PM

Comments

Seraphic Secret is private property, that's right, it's an extension of our home, and as such, Karen and I have instituted two Seraphic Rules and we ask commentors to act respectfully.

1. No profanity.

2. No Israel bashing. We debate, we discuss, we are respectful. You know what Israel bashing is. The world is full of it. Seraphic Secret is one of the few places in the world that will not tolerate this form of anti-Semitism.

That's it. Break either of these rules and you will be banned.

Reminds me of Oriana Fallaci. Gotta love these fearless women.

Posted by: kishke at April 15, 2008 07:49 PM

Kishke:

And Hirsi Ayan, who is now leaving The Netherlands, for the state is unwilling to protect her any longer. She will now probably make her home in America.

Maybe BB will emigrate to America too.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 15, 2008 10:49 PM

Ayaan Hirsi Ali is a wonder! If only she would not extend her fight against Islam to religion as a whole. But really, who can blame her?

Posted by: kishke at April 16, 2008 08:00 AM

Why should she attack religion as a whole, if I might ask?

Posted by: Hospitaller [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 16, 2008 06:13 PM

Hospital: Not sure of your question. If you're asking why she does, it's b/c she has been badly burned by religion, and therefore opposes fundamentalism in all religions. If you're asking why she should, I wouldn't know, b/c I believe she shouldn't.

Posted by: kishke at April 16, 2008 06:35 PM

Hospital:

The point is, Bardot should be free to criticize religion without being persecuted and prosecuted by the State. Nothing she has said has resulted in one act of violence.

France does not prize liberty, it's that simple. They value appeasing their hostile jihadist elements.

In the end, this will mean the end of France.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 16, 2008 08:19 PM

Robert, I think Hospital was aking about Hirsi Ali, not Bardot.

Posted by: kishke at April 16, 2008 08:56 PM


Somewhat related commentary in National Review by Mark Steyn. And don't miss the pic of Bardot and Buckley.


Franco-American summit [Mark Steyn]

Since I brought up the whole "Steyn is the Brigitte Bardot of Canada" business, several readers have emailed me this link to the IMDB page on BB, which features, in what's otherwise a gallery of movie stills, this terrific photo of Bardot & Buckley - Brigitte shaking hands with WFB at El Morocco back in 1965.
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3544356864/nm0000003

I wonder if, among all the tributes to Bill, we didn't pay enough attention to his sheer cool. It was very important to the nascent conservative movement, and we could use a bit more of it today.

Posted by: Real Name at April 16, 2008 09:54 PM

Kishke is correct. I was writing in reference to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, not Brigitte Bardot, and questioning why in Kishke's opinion she should be attacking religion as a whole rather than simply criticizing Islam as she is doing.

By the way, my username is "Hospitaller", as in the Knights Hospitaller or Knights of St. John of Malta, not "Hospital".

Posted by: Hospitaller at April 17, 2008 08:10 AM

Kishke, Hospitaller:

She attacks Islam because:

1. Every terrorist on planet earth is a Muslim. There's a connection.

2. Because her genitals were mutilated in the name of Islam.

3. And because she needs 24/7 protection from Muslim jihadists who want to kill her because of a religious fatwa ordering her murder.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 17, 2008 08:16 AM

Real Name:

Thanks so much for the Steyn link and the great Bardot-Buckley pic.

That is historic.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 17, 2008 08:27 AM

and questioning why in Kishke's opinion she should be attacking religion as a whole

Hospitaller: I hope I have clarified that I don't think she should, but can understand why she does.

Posted by: kishke at April 17, 2008 08:45 AM

Mr. Avrech, I understand she attacks Islam for those reasons, and I approve of her doing so. What I'm uncertain about is Kishke's statement that he wishes she would "extend her fight against Islam to religion as a whole".

I understand the crimes of Islam, well enough, but what has "religion as a whole" done to deserve this hostility from him?

Posted by: Hospitaller at April 17, 2008 08:48 AM

Hospitaller: I hope I have clarified that I don't think she should, but can understand why she does.

Ah, I see. My mistake, sorry.

Posted by: Hospitaller at April 17, 2008 08:49 AM

Scratch that, I'm really, really sorry. Cringingly apologetic, in fact. I hope you'll forgive me for misunderstanding you.

*proceeds to kick himself for being so idiotic as to misread something so completely*

Posted by: Hospitaller at April 17, 2008 08:56 AM

H: A moment before reading your last post I realized you had misread me. No harm done.

Posted by: kishke at April 17, 2008 10:26 AM

H: Any relation to my friend Templar from Dirty Harry's? :)

Posted by: kishke at April 17, 2008 10:28 AM

A moment before reading your last post I realized you had misread me. No harm done.

Oh, good. That's quite a relief.

Any relation to my friend Templar from Dirty Harry's? :)

How'd you guess? My writing style? Yes, it's me, Templar from Libertas. I would have registered through TypeKey as Templar, but it seems someone already had it, so I went with the next most famous Catholic military order.

Posted by: Hospitaller at April 17, 2008 03:55 PM

How'd you guess? My writing style?

That, and by having read that the Templars, after being forcibly disbanded, were assimilated into the Hospitallers.

Posted by: kishke at April 17, 2008 06:57 PM

That, and by having read that the Templars, after being forcibly disbanded, were assimilated into the Hospitallers.

Heh, that's rather oddly appropriate, considering the circumstances. Good call.

Posted by: Hospitaller at April 18, 2008 09:37 PM

"Bardot is being prosecuted—for the fifth time—for insulting Islam." (Robert J. Avrech)

No. Brigitte Bardot has been prosecuted, convicted and coercited for claiming that Muslims are ruling France and destroying its culture.

"Meanwhile, Jew-hating Imams safely spew hatred and call for violence from hundreds of mosques in France"

Evidence?

"The gutless French"

Really?

"the one woman in France who dares speak the truth"

Really? Muslims are ruling France? Sarkozy is Muslim?

"Seraphic Secret has long maintained that within two or three generation [...] France will be an Islamic State ruled by Sharia."

Evidence?

"Bardot should be free to criticize religion without being persecuted and prosecuted by the State." (Robert J. Avrech)

She is.

Posted by: Nicolas Krebs at November 16, 2008 07:43 AM

Nicolas:

Thanks so much for your comments. In fact BB is not free to criticize Islam for when she does she is hauled into court and fined. This is not freedom.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 16, 2008 09:01 AM

"In fact BB is not free to criticize Islam for when she does she is hauled into court and fined." (Robert J. Avrech)

When? Her last convictment is for claiming that Muslims (a bunch of people, not a religion) where ruling the country (and destroying it). There is a law against this in France. "://www.kibush.co.il/show_file.asp?num=28774">In 1886 the French antisemite Edouard Drumont published 'La France Juive' (Jewish France), creating the false nightmarish image of a France dominated by Jews, and sowing the poisonous seeds which came to fruit when Vichi French officials collaborated in the mass muder of French Jewry."

"This is not freedom."

There is never total freedom, deal with this.

Posted by: Nicolas Krebs at November 22, 2008 02:55 PM

I remember

Posted by: www.marlenaselin.netgaleria.pl at January 5, 2009 10:14 AM

Bardot is right, facts don't lie.
Islam is a curse upon people.
For there is no freedom in turning your back on it, this is what is written in the Koran.
So Bardot is right, whatever any judge says.

Posted by: Alexander at March 17, 2009 11:04 AM

"Bardot is right" (Alexander)

Really? France is ruled by Muslims? Sharia is the french law? Nicolas Sarkozy is Muslim?

Posted by: Nicolas Krebs at June 6, 2009 02:25 AM

"They value appeasing their hostile jihadist elements."

Wow the paranoia on this blog is insane.

And I can't tell if comments like this are a joke (I sincerely hope they are):

1. Every terrorist on planet earth is a Muslim. There's a connection.

Posted by: Chris at March 31, 2010 06:27 AM

Post a comment




Please enter the security code you see here


Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)