« Two Funerals and a Wedding: Remembering Gavriel & Rivka Holtzberg ZT'L | Main | My Beautiful Neighborhood VI »

December 04, 2008

Terrorism, Terrorism, Terrorism...

palestinians02.jpg
Pop Quiz. Identify the three masked figures. They are:
a) Gun Men
b) Militants
c) Practitioners of Islamic Theology
d) Professors of Middle Eastern Studies at Columbia University
e) Palestinian Terrorists

*Correct answer at end of article.

If you cannot name the enemy, how can you fight the war they have declared against you, much less triumph in such a conflict?

Great Britain is a tragic example of a nation that has, at governmental levels, willingly adopted Orwellian speak regarding the Islamic terrorists who are successfully chewing away at the fabric of British society. The BBC and the chattering classes, who form and disseminate public policy, have decided that Islamic terror does not exist. All in the name of multi-culturalism.

Psychologists refer to this mechanism of denial as magical thinking. As in: “There's a monster who's going to kill and eat me but I'm going to close my eyes—shut them really, really, really tight—and then the monster will disappear!”

As a consequence of this willing denial of reality and the existential nature of the conflict with transnational Muslim terrorists, I figure that in about two generations, maybe less, with current demographic and immigration patterns, Great Britain will be reduced to an English speaking Caliphite—Judenrein, naturally—operating under Sharia, coolly administered by a Quisling Parliament and a dhimmi Church.

Unless... unless loyal British citizens rise—cue the ghost of Winston Churchill—and forcefully take back their country from the all-devouring Islamic imperialists. To accomplish this the British will have to recognize two facts:

1. The British—okay, I'm throwing in Ireland, Wales, Scotland, Australia, whatever— those who are not Muslim are just filthy Jews, pigs and monkeys, to the Caliphite Islamists, a genocidal and transnational religious movement intent on colonizing Great Britain as D'ar as Islam, a Holy Muslim land. Once this imperial grab is completed, under Sharia, no Muslim land can ever revert back to the hands of the infidels. Thus, perpetual jihad, perpetual terror. This is not a byproduct of Islam. It is Islam.

2. To fight these Islamo Nazis the British will have to get serious about their existence. There is no compromise. There is no appeasement.

It's us or them.

And so, the first step for Britain and for all of Europe, is for the labels: Islamic terrorists, Caliphite Muslims, or my favorite, Islamo Nazis, to become commonplace—for these labels are accurate and necessary.

As it says in Sefer Mishlei, Book of Proverbs, 18:21: Death and life lie in the power of the tongue.

This brings us to a fine article from the Wall Street Journal by Tom Gross in which he asks: If This Isn't Terrorism, What Is?

So why are so many prominent Western media reluctant to call the perpetrators terrorists? Why did Jon Snow, one of Britain’s most respected TV journalists, use the word “practitioners” when referring to the Mumbai terrorists? Was he perhaps confusing them with doctors?
Why did Britain’s highly regarded Channel 4 News state that the “militants” showed a “wanton disregard for race or creed” when exactly the opposite was true: Targets and victims were very carefully selected. Why did the “experts” invited to discuss the Mumbai attacks in one show on the state-funded Radio France Internationale, the voice of France around the world, harp on about Baruch Goldstein (who carried out the Hebron shootings in 1994), virtually the sole case of a Jewish terrorist in living memory?
Unfortunately in recent years we have become used to leftist media burying their heads in the sand about the threat that Islamic fundamentalism poses, in much the same way as they once refused to report accurately on communist atrocities. But now even conservative media may be doing it too.

For the complete article, please click here.

*Answer to Quiz is f)CAIR's Hollywood Office. These Hollywood insiders are responsible for vetting every feature & TV Script in town and they have been doing a bang-up job. There are no Muslim terrorists in Hollywood films. Instead the public has been fed a steady diet of savage American soldiers who murder, rape and chew tobacco. There are also legions of heartless CIA agents who do all sorts of scary covert stuff in the poor Arab Muslim world so naturally the wretches have no choice but to strap on homicide bombs and murder men women and children. Makes perfect sense. And of course, there's Guantanamo and secret prisons which, in the Hollywood imagination, bear a striking resemblance to Dachau. Okay, so I cheated, there wasn't an f) offered in the multiple choices but I'm hoping you can forgive a little levity from yours truly.

Posted by Robert J. Avrech at December 4, 2008 10:54 AM

Comments

Seraphic Secret is private property, that's right, it's an extension of our home, and as such, Karen and I have instituted two Seraphic Rules and we ask commentors to act respectfully.

1. No profanity.

2. No Israel bashing. We debate, we discuss, we are respectful. You know what Israel bashing is. The world is full of it. Seraphic Secret is one of the few places in the world that will not tolerate this form of anti-Semitism.

That's it. Break either of these rules and you will be banned.

My answer to your question:

g) The leadership of the Church of England.

I was close.

Posted by: Jonathan at December 4, 2008 11:32 AM

I almost chose, "Professors of Muslim Studies at Columbia University". CAIR's Hollywood Office is just as horrifying, though not so surprising, unfortunately.

For ONE television show that isn't scared to show Islamic terrorists for who they are, see The Unit on CBS. A recent episode where one of the members of the Unit's daughter, an American soldier stationed in Iraq, is kidnapped by Muslim terrorists was particularly well done.

Posted by: FrumFeminist at December 4, 2008 11:59 AM

The Muslim terrorists and, more to the point here, the CAIR people, know that the news media is particularly stupid when it comes to describing criminals. It was the news media, prompted by lawyers back in the 60's, who started the embarassing trend of calling people wielding pistols on live TV "alleged gunmen," (um, I think we can see that they are gunmen there), etc.

So they knew that a few emails or letters complaining about any use of the word "muslim" would most likely be successful in newsroom USA.

There are two things that most news bosses really fear: angry letters and getting sued.

Why they fear angry letters is pure egotism over sense, since lots of angry letters mean SOMEONE is watching your network or reading your paper... kind of the point, no?

Getting sued is scary I admit, but the law really protects the news media in almost every case. Good luck getting a journalism outfit to pay up for making you look bad. You have to prove real malice. For example, if the news media had decided to take the Richard Jewell case to court, he never would have won because they made a stupid mistake without malice. But NBC and Atlanta Journal Constitution figured they'd cut their losses and they felt guilty. In that case, rightfully so, but it's disgusting that they to want to feel the same remorse for heartless killers.

The point is, the easily intimidated newsmedia is one thing... but now our politicians are just as afraid. Great.

Posted by: Jake at December 4, 2008 01:08 PM

Robert

I observed your blog during and since the Mumbai atrocity and I commend you for your posts. I wanted to comment on a couple of occasions but I decided I didn't have the vocabulary to describe how disgusted I felt about the whole thing.

I suppose the most dominant thought I have is how under siege Jews must feel when you consider that Pakistani terrorists attacking India decided to murder some of India's miniscule Jewish population while they were at it. The incident confirmed in my mind that when the likes of Hamas and Hezbollah attack Israel, they are doing so not to liberate the west bank and Gaza but to liberate Tel Aviv and Haifa.

I do however want to confront you about the contents of your above post as its an issue that bothers me greatly. Look I get it, I really do. You feel that Europe is soft and that we would prefer to bury our heads in the sand rather than confront an aggressor. And you believe that our appeasement mentality is going to come back and bite us on the arse as it already has done in London and Madrid. I agree with this. I for one have never been afraid to call Islamic terrorism for what it is. But if you actually think that the parliamentary democracies of Europe are going to be overthrown by militant Muslims living in our midst then you're not really in the game here as far as this debate is concerned. I mean that with all sincerity and respect. You have simply got it wrong here and people who support this theory to such an extent come across foolishly. Its like a right wing version of "the world trade center was brought down by a controlled demolition", it just doesn't add up.

I can only speak expertly on my own country, and you are expecting me to accept your calculations that by the time I'm a middle aged man my country is going to be ruled by Muslim terrorists. I have my finger very close to the pulse on this one. Of the 40,000 Muslims living in Ireland there are very few that hold extremist views and it appears that none of these are willing to act on them.

I understand how bewildered you must feel when you see images of mad imans protesting aggressively in Leister square but do you really think the British French Dutch and Danes will let things get as bad as you fear.

We will have to be tough. We will have to confront the politically correct establishment that has us paralysed when it come do dealing with immigration but Europe is strong, determined and proud and as my Israeli friend always says to me "We aint going nowhere".

Posted by: Ted at December 4, 2008 05:51 PM

Ted,

I don't think the nightmare scenario is Europe's parliamentary democracies being overthrown by militant Muslims so much as it is Europe's aging below-replacement-birth-rate population slowly succumbing to a vibrant high-birth-rate Islamic culture. I think the future of Europe will boil down to a numbers game.

Posted by: Jonathan at December 4, 2008 06:20 PM

Dear Robert: I've come to the conclusion that many Europeans, Englishmen in particular, are so anxious to see Israel finished off that they don't care if their countries go Islamofascist. Why don't you adapt Peter Abrahams' book Tongues of Fire? That's so sympathetic to Israel, it will give the guys in the CAIR office a stroke.

Posted by: Miranda Rose Smith at December 4, 2008 11:07 PM

Dear Robert: I've come to the conclusion that many Europeans, Englishmen in particular, are so anxious to see Israel finished off that they don't care if their countries go Islamofascist. Why don't you adapt Peter Abrahams' book Tongues of Fire? That's so sympathetic to Israel, it will give the guys in the CAIR office a stroke.

Posted by: Miranda Rose Smith at December 4, 2008 11:09 PM

Robert,

Even though you don't share my love of cats, I hope that you will forgive me a bit of levity of my own.

I often think that cats would be much better than many of the leaders we have today. At least they know how to deal with an enemy who is out to destroy them.

Posted by: Rahel at December 5, 2008 05:10 AM

The answer is g) all of the above, simultaneously.

Posted by: mkagan at December 5, 2008 11:40 AM

My favorite is the BBC's (or as I call it, "Habibi Cee:" "anti-Muslim activities."

Posted by: Alex Bensky at December 7, 2008 02:39 PM

Jonathan:

Powerful elements in the Church of England, as I understand it, are intent on being all fuzzy-wuzzy with Islam. It won't work. Islam does not view this engagement as "friendly," but as a mortal weakness to be exploited.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech at December 7, 2008 11:47 PM

Frum Fem:

"The Unit" was created by David Mamet, a liberal who matured in this post 9-11 world into a Conservative. He's also a Jew who, in the past few years, has become more involved in Judaism. Mamet is also one of America's greatest writers for stage and screen. The show does not do great in the ratings, and Hollywood pretty much ignores the series when it's time to hand out the Emmy, but Mamet persists and it's a fine show.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech at December 7, 2008 11:54 PM

Jake:

The media have morphed from stupidity and cowardice into terrorist enablers.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech at December 8, 2008 12:02 AM

Ted:

Thanks for the articulate and generous feedback. Yes, Jews do feel under siege, and that the major newspapers did not discuss, in depth, that 10 Muslim terrorists assigned two of their number to kill Jews, well, it shows that the media don't think it's worthy of note. I also believe that the media skate past the Jew-hatred, part and parcel of Islam and Islamic terrorism, and thus betrays their fear of exposing most anti-Zionism as plain old Jew-hatred.

I greatly appreciate your feelings about Europe and especially Ireland.

I hope you're right. I think the Irish have a better chance of repelling Islam than the English. You guys are not afraid of a fight, and heck, you didn't even want to be absorbed in the dopey EU.

Good move.

However, birth rates in too many European countries are approaching negative growth for Christians, whereas Muslims have many, many more children. Add to this the immigration numbers and so the demographics do not look good.

My source for this is Mark Steyn's invaluable book: "America Alone."

Read it and let me know what you think.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 8, 2008 12:14 AM

Jonathan:

Yes, birth rates,immigration, and the appeasement mind-set in too many European capitals. All this worries me greatly about the future of a civilized Judea Christian Europe.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 8, 2008 12:17 AM

Miranda:

There is no question that Jew-hatred is on the rise in England. With so many Muslims eroding the ethical fabric of that once great country, it's almost inevitable, for Jew-hatred is built into Islam.

Some day the English will wake up and realize that they have betrayed their loyal and productive Jewish citizens for disloyal, on the dole Muslims who want nothing more than to replace English common law with the savagery of Sharia.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 8, 2008 12:23 AM

Rahel:

It's true I'm not a cat guy, but I'm also not a dog guy. But I have seen cats play with their prey and then make short work of them. Ouch!

Excellent.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 8, 2008 12:28 AM

MKagan:

Yup, 100% correct. You win!

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 8, 2008 12:30 AM

Alex:

The BBC world view is best described as Al Jazeera with even more Jew-hatred disguised as "mere anti-Zionism."

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 8, 2008 12:33 AM

Thanks Robert

I will do my usual trick this Christmas where I buy a book I want for a family member and then read it myself when they get bored. This year it will be Mark Steyn's "America Alone". I will let you know what I think.

Posted by: Ted at December 9, 2008 12:06 PM

Ted:

That's great. I'm anxious to hear your opinion.

And another book for Christmas, shameless plug:

"The Hebrew Kid and the Apache Maiden"

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0975438220/ref=s9subs_c6_14_img1-rfc_g1-frt_g1-3237_g1_si1?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=center-1&pf_rd_r=06NGRH4P4J4R4CCMHZK1&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=463383351&pf_rd_i=507846

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech at December 9, 2008 12:15 PM

Post a comment




Please enter the security code you see here


Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)