« Lupe Velez: When Shame, Abortion and Suicide Collide | Main | Chanukah 2009 »

December 09, 2009

Authentically Gish, Garbo, Tiger, Obama and Uh-Huh, Palin

Album_246523.jpg
Lilian Gish, Broken Blossoms, 1919, a genuine Hollywood star.

Americans admire excellence and authenticity.

The rise of the Hollywood movie star was built on powerful performances that projected the idea of authentic emotions. Film audiences experienced a magical connection—often, deeply intimate—with scores of charismatic actors.

Lillian Gish's heartbreaking performance as the abused daughter in Broken Blossoms (1919) cemented the image of a sensitive and vulnerable child/woman. It did not matter that Gish was, in fact, rigid and hard-headed. The huge shadows on the silver screen settled the matter in the public's mind.

Garbo's close-ups—she was gawky in long shot and her best director, Clarence Brown, kept her in tight shots a majority of the time—convey a world of passion and emotional depth. In truth, Garbo was a shallow narcissistic who loved herself above all others.

Carson's Couch

johnny__carson_and_ed_mcmahon1243924879.jpg
Johnny Carson, the slayer of stars.

Hollywood star artifice was forever shattered by the birth of television. Specifically, Johnny Carson's late night show. The star system, already threatened due to the decline of the studios, was dealt a death blow by Carson's couch. Stars submitted to unscripted interviews in order to promote their latest film. But absent studio minders, captured in unflattering TV lights and unequal to Carson's rapid fire wit, most stars shriveled, frequently revealing breathlessly dim personalities. And as the evening wore on and the fidgety actor moved down the couch to make room for the newer guest, the pale star was reduced to the role of disposable prop.

Genuine Hollywood stars were dead and celebrity—a culture of sordid notoriety—moved in to fill the vacuum.

Tiger in Your Tank

tiger_woods.jpg
Tiger Woods, a case study in authentic artifice.

Tiger Woods was an old fashioned star for a brief and shining moment. The greatest golfer ever, he was young, handsome, modest and best of all to a generous American public, black. Sorta.

Married with children, he was Clark Gable, Jimmy Stewart and Sidney Poitier all rolled into one.

But now that carefully constructed public persona has been shattered by an emerging scandal.

Tiger Woods ads and endorsements are gradually being pulled and we can expect a further erosion in his corporate support.

To an adoring public, Tiger's authenticity has been revealed as smooth artifice.

Excellence is not enough.

Obama, Sorta
So it is with President Barack Obama.

He was perceived as a prime example of American excellence. Handsome, bright, an accomplished politician and yes, black. Sorta.

America voted for an image.

There was no record of genuine accomplishments. We were gravely informed that being a community organizer—code for socialist agitator—was superb preparation to be POTUS.

And Obama's dismal one-hundred and fifty days in the Senate consisted of a record number of “Present” votes.

The only thing we knew for sure about candidate Obama was that he spoke well, looked good in a suit and his unflappable manner suggested a man who was serious and capable.

In a very short time, Obama has been unmasked as a fraud and blunderer who regularly delivers preposterous and self-contradictory gems such as:

“We have to spend our way to prosperity.”

Nothing less than a radical call for endless deficits and the advent of an American nanny state.

In foreign policy, Obama has so devalued America's exceptional role in the world that our allies are deeply shaken, and our enemies emboldened.

Recently, an ambassador from Kuwait quietly slipped into Iran for the very first time.

Kuwait, terrified of Iran, realizes that it can no longer count on America to project its power, thus she is preparing the ground to gain entry into Iran's brutal orbit.

Kuwait, along with the entire Arab Muslim world, understands that Obama is an amateur, genuinely weak.

Yup, Sarah Palin

sarah-palin-flag.jpg
Sarah Palin, an authentic American star.

Which brings us to Sarah Palin.

The liberal media claim that she is a joke, that she doesn't matter. She has been pornified and attacked in a manner that is unique in modern American politics.

In response to the Palin phenomenon, liberals have enthusiastically embraced Lenin's ruthless advice: “We are not interested in debating our political opponents, we only want to crush them.”

It's not hard to comprehend this level of vitriol.

Much to their dismay, liberals understand that the American people are responding to an authentic person. A voice and image that resonates with deeply felt American values.

Palin touches the historic American core in a way that elitists like Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer and their ilk cannot begin to comprehend much less project.

When Obama appears on our TV screens in yet another baffling and tedious speech/lecture/kvetch we sigh, exhausted, because the Obama artifice is, by now, so naked, we marvel that his handlers don't realize that Obama has become a poison pill for Obamism—a political and social philosophy that is, at best, at odds with classical American Judeo Christain values.

But when Sarah Palin simply Tweets—her death panel Tweet is now historic—people pay attention, people react, ordinary people take to the streets.

Authenticity has become such a rare commodity in the public sphere that when it appears, the very landscape shifts under our heels.

Posted by Robert J. Avrech at December 9, 2009 09:08 AM

Comments

Seraphic Secret is private property, that's right, it's an extension of our home, and as such, Karen and I have instituted two Seraphic Rules and we ask commentors to act respectfully.

1. No profanity.

2. No Israel bashing. We debate, we discuss, we are respectful. You know what Israel bashing is. The world is full of it. Seraphic Secret is one of the few places in the world that will not tolerate this form of anti-Semitism.

That's it. Break either of these rules and you will be banned.

There was no record of genuine accomplishments.

C'mon Robert. Everyone knows the answer to his lack of accomplishments is that he ran the greatest campaign in the history of presidential elections. I just heard that again the other day on Morning Joe. Of course since it was MSNBC, it is best ignored.

Palin is the anti-Obama. Her qualifications have nothing to do with degrees from Ivy League schools (by the way, has anyone seen those transcripts yet) but the common sense average Americans understand at a gut level.

Think of the health care bill rolling through Congress. Between Obama and Palin, which politician is more likely to come up with such a Rube Goldberg monstrosity? Or the cap and trade scam? Or the $800 billion non-jobs bill. Would Palin ever tabulate jobs saved without any supporting data?

And is there any doubt Palin would be more realistic about the nature of our enemies in the ME? I know Palin would never go to Cairo and apologize to followers of a religion stuck in the 8th century.

And I miss Johnny Carson.

Posted by: Johnny at December 9, 2009 12:01 PM

Robert - interesting thoughts today. I hadn't considered the connection between Obama and Woods until your blog. From all that I have read of Woods I think his father, a retired Green Beret Colonel - who taught him the mental toughness to excel in golf - would be disappointed in his son.

His aura, as you say, is not only unraveling but coming apart at the seams.

A great book on Carson is by Ed McMahon. Ed said at the very first show in 1962, "What are we going to do Johnny?", to which Carson replied, "I don't know, but lets entertain the hell out of them". Which he did for 30 years.

While he did reveal the stars to be ordinary people (and I hadn't thought of that as a one more reason for the decline of the studio system) - Carson never made himself look good at the expense of a guest. He was - and remains - the king of late night because of his quick wit and spontaneity. And I think Ed was critical in his success because he used him to bounce stuff off.

I watch some of the Carson skits and interviews on DVD and realize that we didn't know what we had until he was gone. It's not that the successors are bad; he was that good.

One of my all time favorites was on an early visit from NY to Burbank, George Gobel is the 3rd interviewee - and comes in on Bob Hope and Dean Martin.

When George saw Hope and Martin, he said, "Did you ever think that the world is a tuxedo and you are a pair of brown shoes?"

Sara Palin - I have bought her book and it is an interesting read. I've been reading of her race to become first in the Wasilla city council and then the mayorship - her unsuccessful run for Lt Governor outspent 5:1 but narrowly lost)...

Whether people like her or not will always be; but nobody should dismiss her thinking she doesn't know politics.

Wherever she goes she meets 1000s of people. She reminds me a bit of Reagan. Both got vitriol from the left - not just disagreement but hatred and dismissiveness - in Palin's case it is more personnel.

One has to think if she were the true lightweight some people think she is, she would be ignored.

She isn't, and she isn't.

Posted by: Bill Brandt at December 9, 2009 12:10 PM

"her death panel Tweet is now historic". It's historic because of its stupidity and falseness; which is indicative of why the media is obsessed with Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Trevor L. at December 9, 2009 03:30 PM

I think a high % of Palin-haters are people whose identity is strongly tied to their educational credentials, and who bitterly resent high-profile success by anyone not possessing such credentials.

Very much like European aristocrats of an earlier era.

Posted by: david foster at December 9, 2009 03:39 PM

"Obama has been unmasked as a fraud and blunderer"

Robert, I must be honest. I am beginning to find your intense dislike of President Obama somewhat monotonous. The President has ordered 55,000 troops to Afghanistan in his first year in office (more than GWB sent in seven years) yet in a recent post you accused him of seeing terrorism as merely a criminal matter. I think its time to ask yourself, are you an Obama critic or just an Obama basher?

Posted by: Ted at December 9, 2009 04:43 PM

Ted:

Obama's record deficits will bankrupt my country. The only way to pay this horrifying deficit is through hyper-inflation, i.e. printing money or a VAT. Either way, our economy will sink and so will the global economy.

I support our defensive war in Afghanistan. But I believe we should fight to win. Obama fights his way to an exit ramp. This is a recipe for defeat.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2009 05:11 PM

David:

Indeed, Palin did not graduate from an Ivy League university therefore she is grist for the hate mongers.

As William Buckley famously said: “I'd rather be governed by the first one hundred names in the Boston phone book than a group of Harvard graduates.”

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2009 05:14 PM

Trevor:

Harry Reid just compared those of us who oppose a government take-over of our medical system to those who opposed the abolition of slavery.

According to your logic the media should be obsessed with Reid's stupidity and falseness.

Alas, this is not the case.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2009 05:17 PM

Bill:

My wife, a Ph.D psychologist, believes that the death of Tiger Woods father knocked the golf champ off-kilter. Tiger's father was a mentor and moral touchstone whose absence is sorely felt and acted out by his son.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2009 05:22 PM

Johnny:

You nailed it when you mention Palin's common sense. It is a great American virtue—think Thomas Paine before he went loony—that, all too often, is cast aside in favor of utopian social and political models.

Posted by: Robert J. Avrech [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2009 05:26 PM

Good post, except for the fact that I've never considered Obama a good speaker. I can "hear him reading." His speeches don't always sound "natural." Sans teleprompter
, he's insecure. That's not a sign of being a good speaker.
Sarah Palin frightens the Left, because she's both attractive and mostly unshakable. As VP candidate she took orders and was sorry, because she saw that the Republican bosses didn't want her to win. She'll do well as long as she stays "rogue."

Posted by: batya at December 9, 2009 09:15 PM

Trevor, I have long been mystified by the left's claim that the "death panel" statement was false. It was Obama himself who said, instead of treating Grandma to give her a chance to be cured, we give her a pill and let her fade into the long goodnight - a form of benevolent euthenasia (there are two words that dont go together). The public option included panels that would decide whether and what medical procedures would be approved in any particular occaision. So if they are charged with treating our elderly or already seriously ill with a pain pill rather than treatment to prolong life, well, what would you call such a thing? "Death panel" was wholly appropriate based on Obama's own statements. Those such as yourself who state that her description was "stupid and false" inevitably simply repeat bald conclusions with constant repetition. It is an effective technique if people aren't paying attention. But for those who are, you're very weak rhetorical devices used in place of argument are obvious.

What a great essay Robert. Well done. But Palin hatred goes beyond merely the desire to crush a challenge to power - it is to destroy her utterly because all that she stands for - her authenticity as you put it - is not merely a challenge to the left, but a mortal threat to many of their most cherished shibboleths. A woman who does not take her place in their pantheon of victims, a woman who has risen on her own in the supposedly gender hating Republican Party, a woman who aspires to power but, as many commenters have pointed out, is not of the elite, a woman who has experienced all of the challenges of life in Middle America, these are challenges to the core of the leftist narrative. And that, I think, is why the vitriol aimed at her has gone to a level heretofore never seen in American politics.

Posted by: GW at December 9, 2009 10:12 PM

Mel Blanc and Charlton Heston, both of blessed memory, did quite well for themselves on Johnny Carson's show. If he made celebrities look bad, they would have refused to appear on his show and it would have gone off the air in fairly short order.

Posted by: Miranda Rose Smith at December 9, 2009 11:03 PM

For me, the most memorable Johnny Carson moment was his interview with Jack Lemmon in 1969 or 70. Jack told the story about the day he auditioned for the show "Mister Roberts", his vehicle to stardom. He said that it was a very cold day, and he stood outside the theater for a long time in a long line of men. He said that if anyone would have told him while waiting in that line that he would get a major role in the show, get the role in the movie, and go on to get the awards and such a wonderful career.....he would thought you were dreaming.
In the decades since I have remembered this story many, many times. Keep going, don't stop...don't give up. It was a tribute to Carson's talent that he could get these great stars to open up.

Posted by: Norm at December 10, 2009 05:40 AM

I consider Obama's speech patterns to be completely Shatnerian, so I never "got" the swooning over his oratory.

One of my students once made a snotty remark equating GWB's tendency to mangle words and his intelligence. I just gave him my best Spock eyebrow and said my dad also mangles words, and he's an absolutely brilliant person.

Student is still fawningly apologizing.

Posted by: DrCarol at December 10, 2009 08:37 AM

In Palin, you have "Genuine". In Obama, you have "sham and fraud". It's no wonder Liberal Democrats hate Palin so much. They've got nothing but an empty suit to counter her with.

Robert, you could do a long thread on Carson by itself. My best memories of Carson was when he got Ed Ames to demonstrate throwing a tomahawk, and the time Burt Reynolds showed up in black leather pants and had a can of whipped cream. Pure slapstick and funny.

Posted by: PCD at December 10, 2009 10:19 AM

Palin does have a genuineness about her that is refreshing. However, credentials do matter, including educational credentials. I'd be happy to support her as, say, my senator or governor, but I'm nervous about the idea of her as president. Still, I'd support her over almost any Democrat. (Maybe not Liebermann, but then he isn't really a Democrat anymore, is he?)

But I don't get the vitriol. Envy? Fear? All seem plausible but don't really hold up that well to close inspection. It's something more visceral, and I just don't have those kinds of viscera.

Posted by: Kent G. Budge at December 10, 2009 12:29 PM

Kent, What are Obama's independently verifiable Education Credentials?

By the way, I attended a year at the U of Idaho. It is not a bad school, just not as batcrap crazy liberal as the elite's schools.

Posted by: PCD at December 11, 2009 08:17 AM

Post a comment




Please enter the security code you see here


Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)