It makes complete sense that these three evil dictators will be at Copenhagen.

I predict they will be cheered by the crowd.

And if they're not openly cheered, they will be quietly applauded.

Why?

It is becoming ever more clear that the real goal of the environmental movement is the removal of most of the human population from this planet.

August environmentalists like Prince Charles and several elected leaders have basically said that the human population is destructive, etc.

Thus, why not applaud the appearance of three men who have helped reduce the populations of their own countries quite greatly over the past decade? Murderers and greenies are finding much in common these days.

The easiest rebuttal to "Climate Change" (spoken as the mantra for the global warming crowd and not its more obvious connotation) is to mention "Greenland".

Once upon a time (circa 973 to be ecxact) it was GREEN. The vikings settled there and farmed for about 200 years.

Then it got cold.

Whenever I see that ridiculous bumper sticker, "War is Not the Answer", I mumble to myself "But Terrorism is??!?!" Really, if I were to have a conversation with one of these car owners, what would their genius solution be then? If singing Kumbaya and giving out flowers really did work, then the 60's would have been the last decade that would have presented any violence or strife.

Would this mentality solve problems in the workplace? Uh, I don't think so!

Argh!

I agree with all that you have said, though I think you stop to soon with Ahmedinejad as to whom he threatens. He poses a mortal threat to Israel, but he poses a similar threat to the world, really. Iran is at war at the moment - in Yemen, and carrying out terrorist acts in Saudi Arabia in support of that war. They pose a mortal threat to Iraq, where they have once again begun their efforts to Lebanize that country. I could go on with examples of literally every mid-east nation that Iran threatens. And any Western nation that can look at this and not feel that there is a direct threat to their nation is naive beyond imagining. This threat grows exponentially as one realizes that, our allowing of Iran to continue on its nuclear trajectory is resulting in nuclear proliferation throughout the Middle East. This is not simply a direct threat to the world, it is one on par with Nazi Germany circa 1937.

The regime will be stopped in one of two ways - it will be destroyed internally by a revolution - the preferred solution - or it will be destroyed in war. Yet Obama sits on the sidelines, doing nothing to move forward either solution. Is there a person alive with any knowledge of the regime who could not have forecast with certainty that Obama's "aggressive diplomacy" would be worse than useless, as in addition to not dissuading the mad mullahs, it buys them ever more time. At a critical moment in history, when we need Churchill, we are saddled with Chamberlain.

At any rate, thank you so much for the link and kind words. It is, as always, very much appreciated.

I know this is very un-PC, but my pet liberalism is "homophobe." People with old-fashioned values don't have an irrational fear of homosexuals. They believe them to be immoral. And people who hate gays and lesbians out of bigotry are, well, bigots.

But back to Climategate. The BBC World Service (!) broadcast an interesting opinion piece a few days ago, by Clive James: They then followed up on these 11 minutes of sanity with their weekly half-hour environmentalist program. (Excuse me - "programme.")

One thing that still gives me a kick is how only bad things are predicted to come out of climate change. I guess it's like what Dr. Paul (of MIT!) says: All change is for the worse.

I just found an "old" article that states the reason the earth is getting hotter is because of the sun. I suppose the staunch "climate change" folks that believe otherwise know it's impossible to change what the sun is doing.....unless that's an untapped issue to rant/conspire about?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/3325679/The-truth-about-global-warming---its-the-Sun-thats-to-blame.html

Jake:

You are quite right, the Greenies actually see humanity as just another pollutant.

You just wait, next stop will be to globalize China's policy of one child per family.

Which, by the way, results in the death of untold number of girl infants. Murdered by parents who prefer to have a male offspring.

Bill:

Greenland, yeah. Big problem. But I think the Vikings caused all that melting by, er, unbridled flatulence.

Rachel:

Whenever I park in one of the studios here in Hollywood I spend time reading all the dopey socialist style bumper stickers on the Jags, Mercede's, Bentley's and BMW's.

It is surreal.

GW:

You are absolutely correct in correcting my somewhat pale analysis of the Persian threat. The Mullah's are a threat to the globe.

I'm not sure if regime change in Iran would put a stop to their nuclear ambitions. Every poll that I've seen shows that the Iranian people believe it is their right to possess nuclear power.

Anyway, Israel is not going to wait to find out. There will be a strike in 2010.

Very good to have you back. We sorely missed you during your long hiatus.

Remember those computer-generated specials on Nat Geo and Discovery Channel in 2007 that depicted the Earth with no humans? Believe me, this was like porn for the greenies. Those specials and the buzz they got from the Left were a revelation to me.

The point is, a growing number of "environmentalists" have taken on the ethos of the animal rights activists. They don't believe that humans WILL destroy the world, they believe humans HAVE destroyed the world already and the only hope is for us to go away and let the elk an lions and tigers roam free again.

"At a critical moment in history, when we need Churchill, we are saddled with Chamberlain"

As I may have noted here before, comparison of Obama with Chamberlain is unfair to Chamberlain. While Chamberlain pursued a very unwise policy of appeasement, he also built up Britain's defenses--including production of the Hurricane and Spitfire fighters and the deployment of the world's first integrated air defense network. I haven't seen anything of the kind from Obama.

And I also believe Chamberlain admitted he made a mistake and threw himself into the war effort until he died early into the war. Can anyone believe Obama, Pelosi et al will admit their mistakes one day?

Barney Frank won't even take responsibility for pushing crappy mortgages onto the banks ten years ago.