Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /homepages/15/d750806638/htdocs/clickandbuilds/SeraphicSecret555864/wp-includes/pomo/plural-forms.php on line 210
Warning: Use of undefined constant _FILE_ - assumed '_FILE_' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /homepages/15/d750806638/htdocs/clickandbuilds/SeraphicSecret555864/wp-content/plugins/easygravatars/easygravatars.php on line 14
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /homepages/15/d750806638/htdocs/clickandbuilds/SeraphicSecret555864/wp-includes/pomo/plural-forms.php:210) in /homepages/15/d750806638/htdocs/clickandbuilds/SeraphicSecret555864/wp-content/plugins/wp-math-captcha/includes/class-cookie-session.php on line 46
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /homepages/15/d750806638/htdocs/clickandbuilds/SeraphicSecret555864/wp-includes/pomo/plural-forms.php:210) in /homepages/15/d750806638/htdocs/clickandbuilds/SeraphicSecret555864/wp-content/plugins/wp-math-captcha/includes/class-cookie-session.php on line 49
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /homepages/15/d750806638/htdocs/clickandbuilds/SeraphicSecret555864/wp-includes/pomo/plural-forms.php:210) in /homepages/15/d750806638/htdocs/clickandbuilds/SeraphicSecret555864/wp-content/plugins/wp-math-captcha/includes/class-cookie-session.php on line 49
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /homepages/15/d750806638/htdocs/clickandbuilds/SeraphicSecret555864/wp-includes/pomo/plural-forms.php:210) in /homepages/15/d750806638/htdocs/clickandbuilds/SeraphicSecret555864/wp-content/plugins/wp-math-captcha/includes/class-cookie-session.php on line 49
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /homepages/15/d750806638/htdocs/clickandbuilds/SeraphicSecret555864/wp-includes/pomo/plural-forms.php:210) in /homepages/15/d750806638/htdocs/clickandbuilds/SeraphicSecret555864/wp-content/plugins/wp-math-captcha/includes/class-cookie-session.php on line 49
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /homepages/15/d750806638/htdocs/clickandbuilds/SeraphicSecret555864/wp-includes/pomo/plural-forms.php:210) in /homepages/15/d750806638/htdocs/clickandbuilds/SeraphicSecret555864/wp-content/plugins/wp-math-captcha/includes/class-cookie-session.php on line 49 Flashback: Vogue for Hillary
This is a simulacrum of Hillary Clinton by Annie Lebovitz.
No surprise that the ultra leftist elitists of Vogue endorsed Hillary.
But then let’s not forget that Vogue published a glowing article about the awesomely chic Asma al-Assad of Syria, which in full Orwellian overdrive, Vogue scrubbed from their website when the mass killings started soon after publication.
Anyway, here’s Vogue’s Hillary endorsement, which is hilarious, especially this qualifier: “We understand that Clinton has not always been a perfect candidate…”
For all the chaos and unpredictability and the sometimes appalling spectacle of this election season, the question of which candidate actually deserves to be president has never been a difficult one.
Vogue has no history of political endorsements. Editors in chief have made their opinions known from time to time, but the magazine has never spoken in an election with a single voice. Given the profound stakes of this one, and the history that stands to be made, we feel that should change.
Vogue endorses Hillary Clinton for president of the United States.
Perhaps that sentence won’t come as a surprise. Vogue has enthusiastically covered Hillary Clinton’s career, her rise from Yale law student to governor’s wife to First Lady to senator to Secretary of State. She has been profiled by the magazine six times.
(For the record, we have also featured Donald Trump—or, more particularly, his family members Ivana, Marla, Melania, and Ivanka—multiple times in our pages.)
We understand that Clinton has not always been a perfect candidate, yet her fierce intelligence and considerable experience are reflected in policies and positions that are clear, sound, and hopeful.
She supports comprehensive immigration reform, including a path to citizenship. She speaks up for racial justice, for reforming policing and sentencing laws. Her years as Secretary of State have shown that she understands how to strengthen alliances abroad, respond to global crises, and continue American leadership in the world. She is forceful in her support for LGBTQ rights, including an end to discrimination against transgender people. She knows the challenges working women face. Her tax proposals and commitment to infrastructure investment will be a boon to the middle class. She will continue the important work on health-care reform begun by President Obama. She is a sane voice on guns.
Can Clinton unify a deeply divided America? Heal the wounds of this unbearably fraught political season? Our divisions are real, and it will take more than one intensely qualified leader to heal them.
And yet two words give us hope: Madam President. Women won the vote in 1920. It has taken nearly a century to bring us to the brink of a woman leading our country for the first time. Let’s put this election behind us and become the America we want to be: optimistic, forward-looking, and modern.
Let’s head to the polls on Tuesday, November 8, and vote.
Reader Interactions
Comments
Shylasays
“…her fierce intelligence”–is there ever a liberal who is not deemed “brilliant” by other liberals? She may be, she may not, but the left’s only qualification for that label is “one of us.”
“…her fierce intelligence”–is there ever a liberal who is not deemed “brilliant” by other liberals? She may be, she may not, but the left’s only qualification for that label is “one of us.”
You said it.
Speaking of Fake News, when did Hillary Clinton even vaguely resemble the Artist’s Rendering above?
At first glance, I thought it was a photo of a well-known actress who’s name escapes me.
whose not who’s