The idea is to fool the eye, to convince the viewer that the object exists in three dimensions. But of course, the surface is flat. It is a masterful illusion.
So it is with Barack Obama and the postmodern Democrat party, who wage a ceaseless campaign of political trompe l’oeil. The Constitution, the separation of powers, America’s national borders, the very meaning of citizenship, all are being rendered illusions in order to better serve the totalitarian ideology that is at the heart of the Democrat party.
From the very beginning of his run for the Presidency, Obama spun a spiderweb of illusions, sure in the knowledge that the color of his skin was impenetrable armor against criticism. When Obama’s spiritual mentor Jeremiah Wright was unmasked as an American and Jew-hating bigot, Obama claimed that in 20 years he never — not once — heard any of Wright’s hateful sermons.
Only the willfully gullible would believe Obama’s shameless denial.
The list of Obama’s lies is as long as the mountain of gibberish that is Obamacare. And as Jonathan Gruber smirked, that law was designed to fool a foolish people.
Obama’s greatest work of trompe l’oeil is on behalf of radical Islam. Obama thanked “Muslim Americans for their many achievements and contributions to building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy.”
Even for Obama, this is an incandescent fantasy, a rewriting of American history that is half lies and the other half untrue.
And now that Benjamin Netanyahu has alerted the American people to Obama’s unAmerican appeasement to Tehran, Obama is going to bypass Congress — the voice of the American people — in favor of a dubious U.N. ratification.
On that grim note let’s tale a look at our latest collection of stills that will, hopefully, brighten our mood.
Maayan Ariel is also not yet a hardened pro in front of the camera.
May it long remain so.
I second Moishe3rd, always look forward to your Friday eclectic collection of pictures.
I’ll add one point to the discussion here about the “willfully gullible.” One of the most fascinating things I discovered in my research of the era of the American Revolution was the degree to which the Founding Fathers mistrusted democracy. They mistrusted and despised open democracy as much as they mistrusted and despised rule by a King.
When it came time to write a Constitution, they were quite literally torn between their realization that the Revolution would not have occurred but for the unwashed masses and complete mistrust of rule by the same. Their great fear was that the large body of people, not paying close attention, could be swayed by obfuscation and lies from a charismatic person.
That is why, in 1792, they provided for the direct election of only 1/6th of the Federal government officials — the House of Representatives. Senators were appointed by Governors. Judges were appointed by a President with advice and consent. And Presidents were not to be popularly elected. Rather, people would vote for representatives to attend a convention where they would examine and listen to the candidates, and only then choose — i.e., the electoral college.
At any rate, that is a long way of getting around to my point. When you way “willfully gullible,” you are talking about precisely the type of people our Founding Father’s wanted to protect against. Well, them and the man those people elected.
GW:
Thanks so much for another lucid history lesson. Mark Levin talks (screams) about this on his radio show on a daily basis: Rule by Mob.
I fear that if Hillary, or another Democrat takes the White House in ’16, this country will be on its knees to the progressive mob for the foreseeable future.
I believe that it was Alexander Hamilton who, speaking on the pitfalls of Democracy, said: “The People? The People sir, is a Great Beast! (from Revelations)”
Actually, prior to the 17th amendment, senators were elected by the legislature of each state — not the governor.
As for Hamilton, one should remember that he supported unlimited government (however much he pretended otherwise when writing in the Federalist Papers). See his proposal to the Convention (on June 18) — which was ignored at the time. But in fact, the reality we have today of essentially unlimited government and politicians elected for life very closely matches what Hamilton wanted, even though the letter of the Constitution clearly calls for something utterly different than what we ended up with.
For a moment, seeing the first illustration, I thought the post might be about the effects of Seattle’s new minimum wage law. The restaurants in the city are closing. Pretty soon, all there will be is self service and a black board for your order.
https://shiftwa.org/more-seattle-restaurants-close-doors-as-15-minimum-wage-approaches/
Karen and I were in Seattle a few months ago where we spent Shabbat on Mercer Island with out friends Michael and Diane Medved. He took us on a tour of your city and outlined the insane minimum wage laws. It is so sad to see such a lovely city being shredded by crypto Marxists.
I don’t live there but seriously considered moving there and bought 10 acres on Vashon Island about 20 years ago. I finally sold them but still like the area. Seattle is far left politically, unfortunately although that is not why I didn’t move. My kids are all here.
Loved these photos, the last one most of all.
Dr. Carol:
Thanks so much. We heartily agree.
You are an artist, Mr. Avrech. And, that’s it. I am going to start Sharing your Fine Fridays on Facebook. Have a good Shabbos.
Moishe:
Thanks so much for the kind words. Have a wonderful Shabbat.