I assume the phrase moderate Nazi got your attention.
In fact, you probably got a severe case of mental whiplash because your rational brain said: “Hey, self, there’s no such thing as a moderate Nazi. Nazis are, by definition, genocidal racists.”
For the past few days the American public has been treated to a Pavlovian exercise in liberal linguistics as the mainstream media has pushed their narrative of the “moderate Islamist.”
If they say it often enough it must be true.
Time, formerly a respected news magazine, the AP, Reuters the always dependable anti-Semitic New York Times, report in faux authoratative terms—not one of these reporters speaks or reads Arabic or even pays attention to the poisonous Arab media translated into English—that moderate Islamists are poised to gain power in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya.
These organs of rational Western thought explain that once in power groups like the Muslim Brotherhood will face massive unemployment, food shortages, hunger and disease, all the realities of governance. Thus, they will abandon their Jew-hatred, their covenants of racial and religious hatred, and fall into line as, y’know, rational players.
Of course this was the narrative that was sold when Hamas seized power in Gaza. But Hamas did not become moderate. Quite the opposite. They did not build an economic infrastructure. They built up their weapon supplies and increased their fanatic devotion to a genocidal jihad which, by the way, includes persecuting their very own people.
Islamists care nothing for economic development. They see upward mobility as a Western corruption. The strategy of the Islamists is to use any and all methods—lying to gullible Westerners is totally awesome—to gain and keep power, ultimately ruling by sharia and establishing a transnational caliphate.
Jews, Christians, Hindus, Druze, etc. not welcome. Convert or die. That is the message and the goal of the moderate Islamists so beloved by the liberal media.