The statistics charting our nation’s economic decline during the Obama years are devastating and damning.
More and more, under Obama and the Democrat party, America resembles the disastrous Socialist European model that is—big shock—imploding, exploding and melting before our very eyes.
But nothing will deter Obama’s radical ideology which calls for more government regulation, increased spending by an out of control Federal government, and even higher taxes on the middle class.
America is drowning, and the solution according to Obama is a steel life preserver.
Who does Seraphic Secret endorse for the Republican presidential nomination?
Any Republican not named Barack Hussein Obama.
Excluding Ron Paul, who is not a Republican, (I have no idea what he is) and won’t get the nomination anyway.
I agree with you. I like a great deal of what Newt has to say and he would destroy Obama in debate. But he would probably lose the national election.
Dear Robert: Newt Gingrich was 1000% right to say the now-so-called “Palestinians” are an invented people; they never had any separate homeland, besides Jordan, any separate literature, any separate language; they are Arabs, they could have their SECOND autonmous homeland, besides Jordan, any time they agreed to quit killing Jews for five minutes. But Debbie Sclussel is worried that he only said that, true and courageous as it was, to get the evangelical Christian vote.
I am with you Robert on the “Anybody bit Obama” bandwagon. To tell you the truth I have gone though the list of Republicans – except for Ron Paul.
His foreign policy is, to me, other worldly and not reality-based (at least in this world).
His fiscal policy makes sense but when he is outraged at the killing of the Yemeni terrorist who happened to be a US citizen?
Is there any doubt that some German or Japanese American who fought for the other side wouldn’t have met a same fate in WW2?
I liked Herman Cain until his Libya answer – or more accurately, non-answer. That was painful to listen to.
Had he become the Republican nominee and answered similarly that would have been the end.
I tend to be a bit cynical when it comes to “bimbo eruptions” – what they did to Clarence Thomas was inexcusable.
All you need to find is some woman for a “she said/ he said” issue and you have headlines for months.
But in Cain’s case there was enough smoke…
Gingrich – he knows how to appeal to conservatives but to me he is a loose cannon policy wise. And some of the stuff he has said over the years – like his position on man-made global warming – would be perfect fodder for the other side.
He pulled the rug from under Paul Ryan with his proposal to balance the budget, and just today took Romney’s bait by accusing him of “laying off people” – indicating a complete lack of understanding about the dynamism of capitalism.
Romney saved quite a few ailing companies who would have gone under and at least 1 mega hit – Staples. I don’t think Gingrich’s taking $1.6 million from Freddie Mac was ethical – can you say “influence buying?
I have some issues with Romney but truth be told one can find problems with every candidate.
I think I would like Santorum but he is way back in the pack – no money – but – I will probably vote for him in the primary and any Republican nominee in the general.
BTW I think these govt statistics are bogus – I am in both Costco and Walmart in the last 3 days and you could roll a bowling ball down the aisles and not worry about hitting anyone. (that is known among the disciples of Milton Friedman as the “Bowling Ball Test”.
I feel lucky to have gotten my part time (30 hours/week) job last June but there are a lot of suffering people out there.
I would just be happy if anyone running for president got through to voters what a phony debate D.C. has about government spending where a ‘trillion dollar cut’ means we only spend 38 trillion in the next ten years instead of 39 trillion. I think only Bachmann and Paul are the only ones that have tried to get this message through.
But Paul’s isolationist stance should have been sent to the dustbin of history after 12-7-41. As if we can just ignore the world beyond our borders and all will be well. Imagine what the world would look like after 10 years of that.
I was called a bigot on Twitter by a liberal because I sent out a Jihadwatch link about Dahlia Mogahed. *rollseyes*
I wish I could be optimistic about this election. But I can’t.
I’ll vote for whoever the Republicans nominate. But they’re going to nominate Gingrich, based on what a lot of the primary voters seem to think is the most important quality he brings to the table; He isn’t Romney. And Gingrich will then get trounced, because he has a terrible habit of opening his mouth and having words come out of it before his brain is engaged.
The multiple infidelities don’t help either.
kgbudge:
I agree with you. I like a great deal of what Newt has to say and he would destroy Obama in debate. But he would probably lose the national election.
I like Romney. I think the any-Republican-but-Romney mindset is immature and unfair. At this moment in time, I really hope that Mitt is the nominee.
Newt has been married 3 times. Why not just nominate Rush. He is on his 4th or 5th marriage.
Hope after November 2012 we can call him Ex-POTUS.
Jackie:
My prediction if Obama loses is that he’ll go the way of Jimmy Carter: become a vocal critic of Israel and an outspoken spokesman on behalf of Muslim jihadists.
I would rather he do that ouside the WH than IN the WH….
http://www.kwch.com/news/kwch-jcg-hutch-tea-party-website-creates-controversy-20111211,0,1631530.story
Interesting Kansas news ….