Obamacare: The New American Tyranny

Suicide Democrats Health Care.jpg

Update: The Dems have just voted to Slaughter democracy.

Yesterday, Bret Baier of Fox News conducted an actual interview with Barack Hussein Obama.

Baier asked real questions with relevant follow-up.

In short, he was doing the job of an actual journalist.

Something quite unique considering the slobbering Obama press corps.

Obama—on the defensive the entire time—ducked, weaved and filibustered. Really, it was pathetic.

Of all the nonsense Obama spouted—including a defense of the Louisiana kickback that is positivley Chavezian—perhaps the most revealing and chilling is the following:

“I don’t spend a lot of time worrying about what the procedural rules are in the House or Senate,” Obama said. “What I can tell you is that the vote that’s taken in the House will be a vote for health care reform. And if people vote yes, whatever form that takes, that is going to be a vote for health care reform. And I don’t think we should pretend otherwise. And if they don’t, if they vote against it, then they’re going to be voting against health care reform and they’re going to be voting in favor of the status quo.

“So Washington gets very concerned with these procedures in Congress, whether Republicans are in charge or Democrats are in charge,” he said.

Via Hot Air.

Full transcript of Baier-Obama interview here.

The founders of this nation came to these shores to escape rulers like Barack Hussein Obama. Tyrants with no regard for procedure. Tyrants who paid no heed to the voice of the people.

That’s why The Constitution is such an important document.

It is a series of procedures.

If you are an observant Jew, think of The Constitution as a halachic framework.

Well, Barack Hussein Obama has no interest in mere procedure.

He’s only interested in increasing the power of government and making you the citizen a drone in his utopian machine.

Mark my words, if Obamacare becomes the law of the land, we are witness to the birth of a new American tyranny.

Lest you think I’m being an alarmist, the fine lawyer/blogger Bookworm Room labels Obama The New Sun King: “Louis XIV, a despotic monarch, famously said L’etat c’est moi — I am the state.”

And in today’s WSJ, Fred Barnes predicts that Obamacare will turn into a multi-generational malignancy:

America will be in a constant health-care war if ObamaCare is enacted. Passage wouldn’t end the health-care debate. Rather, it would perpetuate ObamaCare as the dominant issue for decades to come, reshape politics, create an annual funding crisis in Congress, and generate a spate of angry lawsuits. Yet few in Washington seem aware of what lies ahead.

We only have to look at Great Britain to get a glimpse of the future. The National Health Service—socialized medicine—was created in 1946 and touted as the envy of the world. It’s been a contentious issue ever since. Its cost and coverage are perennial subjects of debate. The press, especially England’s most popular newspaper, The Daily Mail, feasts on reports of long waiting periods, dirty hospitals, botched care and denied access to treatments.

More here.

Say NO to Obamacare, sign this petition.

This entry was posted in Obama Watch, Obamacare. Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

Comment Rules


Seraphic Secret is private property, that's right, it's an extension of our home, and as such, Karen and I have instituted two Seraphic Rules and we ask commentors to act respectfully.

  1. No profanity.
  2. No Israel bashing. We debate, we discuss, we are respectful. You know what Israel bashing is. The world is full of it. Seraphic Secret is one of the few places in the world that will not tolerate this form of anti-Semitism.

That's it. Break either of these rules and you will be banned.


4 Comments

  1. Johnny
    Posted March 18, 2010 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    And why does a former lecturer at a prestigious law school not understand the constitution as well as the average Joe in the street and a certain former governor of Alaska (who would be endlessly mocked were she to say Hawaii was hit by an earthquake).

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Johnny
    Posted March 18, 2010 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    Brett’s was the only interview that didn’t involve the reporter bowing to Obama (I’m looking at you Brian Williams).
    Why can’t the democrats understand that even if everything goes the way they say it will, this bill will take a trillion dollars out of the private sector and gives it to the government. That’s if it goes the way they say it will.
    Expect health insurance to explode since pre-existing conditions will be covered by insurance. But that is not insurance – it’s a loss that is covered by others. Would Obama run a business where he has to sell a product at a loss? We’re Alice falling through the looking glass trying to figure out why so many people act like Pelosi and Reid and Obama are making sense when they reveal their ignorance of simple economics.
    This country once had a network of religious hospitals that people willingly supported as part of the Judeo-Christian ethos this country was built on. In my town there are 6 Catholic hospitals, a Baptist hospital and a Jewish hospital that now just want their share of the government largesse. It’s so much easier to have a congressman stick in an earmark (think Michelle Obama’s employer in Chicago) than to keep soliciting the support of the community.
    And this whole bill will reduce the deficit. HA!!! Is there some guy named Harold Hill advising the Democrats in D.C.? There is now way this ends with 76 trombones leading a band through River City. I’m betting on the ending from Bridge on the River Kwai – Madness! Madness!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. alterbentzion
    Posted March 18, 2010 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    > If you are an observant Jew, think of The Constitution as a halachic framework.
    Funny – I often use that metaphor in the other direction. The Torah (in Deuteronomy) sets up the Jewish people with what we would call a constitutional monarchy, in which the Torah defines the roles of the Executive, the Judiciary, and even (to an extent) the Legislature.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Steve Wien
    Posted March 18, 2010 at 10:49 am | Permalink

    O doesn’t concern himself with procedure unless it’s involves rights for terrorists.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting