Purim for Catholics

Megillat Esther

Today is the Fast Of Purim. And tonight we read the Book of Esther.

Once upon a time, in the ancient Persian kingdom, there arose a government bureaucrat named Haman, a power-hungry Jew-hater who used the machinery of big government to contrive a genocide of the Jewish people. He told King Achashverosh that the Jews of his kingdom were different.

Here’s how Megillat Esther describes it:

After these events, King Achashverosh promoted Haman the son of Hamedasa, the Agagi, and raised his status, and made his position higher than all the other ministers who were with him. And all the king’s servants who were at the king’s palace gate were bowing down and prostrating themselves to Haman, for so the king had commanded regarding him, but Mordechai [the Jew] would not bow down or prostrate himself.

In every generation there arises a Haman who seeks to destroy the Jews. The ancient Jew-haters of Persia have again risen and this oldest of enmities is playing itself out on the international stage where nuclear weapons have replaced swords and spears.

One of the most interesting features of Megillat Esther is the absence of G-d’s name. This is to teach us that we must not count on miracles or heavenly deliverance.

The name Esther means hidden, which references Esther as a secret Jew in the King’s household, and the hidden hand of G-d.

It is proper that the Jewish people pray and fast, but ultimately we are the authors of our own fate. Thus, we must seize history by the throat and act vigorously in our own defence.

Governments will always seek to consolidate ever greater chunks of power. That is the nature of government as it is the nature of man. Jews and non-Jews must always be on guard against those who seek to curtail freedom in the name of allegedly free stuff—higher and ever higher taxes is the price for government entitelements.

Seraphic Secret strongly urges our friends in the Catholic community—actually, all our non-Jewish friends—to read The Book of Esther. Because at this very moment President Obama is asserting that Catholics are different.

And you are. You believe in a power higher than Obama.

Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic bishops, has released a public letter today detailing a stunning conversation he and other bishops had with top White House officials about the controversial Obama mandate.

In the letter, Cardinal Dolan relates a shocking meeting in which top Obama Administration asked to meet with the bishops to “work out the wrinkles” of the mandate. After accepting the invitation and arriving at the White House, the bishops asked whether any ability to broaden the very narrow religious exemptions in the mandate were off the table.

“The invited us to ‘work out the wrinkles.’  We have accepted that invitation,” he wrote. “Unfortunately, this seems to be stalled: the White House Press Secretary, for instance, informed the nation that the mandates are a fait accompli (and, embarrassingly for him, commented that we bishops have always opposed Health Care anyway, a charge that is scurrilous and insulting, not to mention flat out wrong.”)

Dolan writes:  “At a recent meeting between staff of the bishops’ conference and the White House staff, our staff members asked directly whether the broader concerns of religious freedom—that is, revisiting the straight-jacketing mandates, or broadening the maligned exemption—are all off the table. They were informed that they are. So much for “working out the wrinkles.” Instead, they advised the bishops’ conference that we should listen to the “enlightened” voices of accommodation, such as the recent, hardly surprising yet terribly unfortunate editorial in America.”

He said, “The White House seems to think we bishops simply do not know or understand Catholic teaching and so, taking a cue from its own definition of religious freedom, now has nominated its own handpicked official Catholic teachers

“We have made it clear in no uncertain terms to the government that we are not at peace with its invasive attempt to curtail the religious freedom we cherish as Catholics and Americans,” the archbishop of New York wrote in a public letter to the Catholic bishops last Friday. “We did not ask for this fight, but we will not run from it.”

The Catholic bishops’ president made it appear the mandate is not going to be changed in any way to protect religious freedom.

Dolan said, “The White House already notified Congress that the dreaded mandates are now published in the Federal Registry ‘without change.’ He added that “The Secretary of HHS is widely quoted as saying, ‘Religious insurance companies don’t really design the plans they sell based on their own religious tenets.’ That doesn’t bode well for their getting a truly acceptable “accommodation.”

Cardinal Dolan also said  “We will continue to accept invitations to meet with and to voice our concerns to anyone of any party, for this is hardly partisan, who is willing to correct the infringements on religious freedom that we are now under.  But as we do so, we cannot rely on off the record promises of fixes without deadlines and without assurances of proposals that will concretely address the concerns in a manner that does not conflict with our principles and teaching.”

He added that “Congress might provide more hope, since thoughtful elected officials have proposed legislation to protect what should be so obvious: religious freedom.  Meanwhile, in our recent debate in the senate, our opponents sought to obscure what is really a religious freedom issue by maintaining that abortion inducing drugs and the like are a ‘woman’s health issue.’  We will not let this deception stand.  Our commitment to seeking legislative remedies remains strong.  And it is about remedies to the assault on religious freedom.  Period.”

“Perhaps the courts offer the most light,” he said about the many lawsuits that have been filed against the mandate.

Dolan warned the bishops that “given this climate, we have to prepare for tough times.  Some, like America magazine, want us to cave-in and stop fighting, saying this is simply a policy issue; some want us to close everything down rather than comply (in an excellent article, Cardinal Francis George wrote that the administration apparently wants us to ‘give up for Lent’ our schools, hospitals, and charitable ministries); some, like Bishop Robert Lynch wisely noted, wonder whether we might have to engage in civil disobedience and risk steep fines; some worry that we’ll have to face a decision between two ethically repugnant choices: subsidizing immoral services or no longer offering insurance coverage, a road none of us wants to travel.”

Cardinal Dolan added that “we know so very well that religious freedom is our heritage, our legacy and our firm belief, both as loyal Catholics and Americans.  There have been many threats to religious freedom over the decades and years, but these often came from without.  This one sadly comes from within.  As our ancestors did with previous threats, we will tirelessly defend the timeless and enduring truth of religious freedom.”

Source: LifeNews.com

This entry was posted in 2012 Election, Iran, Obama Watch, Obamacare, Purim and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. Posted March 8, 2012 at 4:54 am | Permalink

    One of the most interesting features of Megillat Esther is the absence of G-d’s name. This is to teach us that we must not count on miracles or heavenly deliverance.
    This is one of the things I love about Torah study – it produces simple gems of insight, which illuminate the books so elegantly. Catholics – as our evangelical friends love to point out – are not encouraged to really read the bible, and in the past were even explicitly told by our clergy that this was their job, and we were to accept their interpretations without protest. Thankfully these days seem to be passing, just as many Catholics have come to understand that our leaders have been less than wise in their handling of issues like Obamacare and indeed the whole Obama presidency – it’s their tacit support of both that’s landed them in this mess.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Shyla
    Posted March 8, 2012 at 4:39 am | Permalink

    When the Cardinal says the comment that the bishops “have always opposed Health Care anyway, a charge that is scurrilous and insulting, not to mention flat out wrong,” it’s hard for me to dredge up much sympathy–in other words, they were fine with government bossing everyone else around, just not Catholics. If they really cared about the Constitution, the bishops would have opposed “Health Care” in the first place, not just when their own ox has been gored.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. elizabeth.onstad
    Posted March 7, 2012 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    I am so glad you mentioned the current attack on religious freedom and conscience in your beautiful note about Purim and Esther. It reminded me that dark forces are gathering and strengthening around us, and that the devout Jew and Christian must close rank and protect one another. Thank you for standing with the Catholic bishops and the Evangelicals who are not just resisting a mandate but resisting government hegemony. Your note also reminded me that tonight I will read the story of Esther’s heroism and consider what it means to be raised up for such a time as this. May this be a holy night.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. DrCarol
    Posted March 7, 2012 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    The National Association for Evangelicals is also involved in this fight, having sent a letter to the President in December about the mandate.  Catholics are the visible face of the religious dissent but are not standing alone.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Johnny
    Posted March 7, 2012 at 10:41 am | Permalink

    In every generation there arises a Haman who seeks to destroy the Jews. 

     Except now we have a president that wants today’s Haman to be his buddy. 

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Bill Brandt
    Posted March 7, 2012 at 10:19 am | Permalink

    Some wrinkle. 
    Was the administration’s invitation simply a P.R. move, since they had no intention of changing anything?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Robert J. Avrech
      Posted March 7, 2012 at 10:27 am | Permalink


      The Obama administration was seeking to hook those Catholics as collaborators, as Catholic Quislings.

      But Dolan is a good and pious man and refused the political seduction. 

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Bill Brandt
        Posted March 7, 2012 at 10:47 am | Permalink

        Robert –
        There is something onerous about this administration to distinguish them from people simply liberal. 
        Obama is as far from a Hubert Humphrey as one could possibly get.
        To read about Cardinal Dolan – he is a man worthy of respect.
        This upcoming election is -to me – as important as the election of 1860. 
        We are at a dangerous crossroads.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

        • AliasJoe
          Posted March 7, 2012 at 11:42 am | Permalink

          I agree, Bill, Obama is no liberal — in the classic sense, anyway.
          I find it ironic that my generation sees JFK as one of the iconic symbols of modern liberalism (the other being FDR), yet Obama is SO FAR TO THE LEFT of JFK that it astounds me! After JFK fought to become the first Catholic president of the United States, it appears that the first African-American president is determined to make Catholics (and all conservative religious organizations) second class citizens (again).
          As Robert said, “Governments will always seek to consolidate ever greater chunks of power. That is the nature of government as it is the nature of man.”
          We are, indeed, at a dangerous crossroads, Bill.

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

          • Bill Brandt
            Posted March 7, 2012 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

            Joe – I think with Obama’s (to me) duplicity in re: Israel (and the American people for that matter), his running roughshod over religious freedom (the Catholics will merely be the first if he has his way) I think he is a man who would be happy to be dictator.
            His making “recess appointments” – while the Senate was still in session certainly supports my contention that he has no respect for our democratic institutions.
            His reckless spending – making G.W. Bush look like a spendthrift – giving billions of dollars (literally) to political cronies and allies – all seems more like a Third World dictator than a US President.

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

            • AliasJoe
              Posted March 8, 2012 at 6:32 am | Permalink

              “giving billions of dollars (literally) to political cronies and allies”
              But, Bill, that money ensures that the elite will remain the elite and then they can determine what’s good for us… commoners.
              After all, they’re doing it “for the children”.

              Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Johnny
      Posted March 7, 2012 at 10:35 am | Permalink

      The first tip-off of Obama’s intentions was that the staffers representing the White House were Rev Wright, Louis Farakhan, Rashid Khalidi and Bill Maher. They were the only Democrats that could spell pope (though Maher got it wrong on his first try) so they figured they knew Catholic doctrine.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting