Understanding the UN, Brothel of Hate

A major part of Barack Obama’s multi-lateral (see under: appeasement) approach to foreign policy involves deeper US engagement with the UN, a corrupt institution whose major function in world affairs is to delegitimize Israel and Judaism.

In a sense, the UN is Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity church on a global scale: a place where Orwellian speak is the norm, where good becomes evil, a place where genocide is either ignored or enabled—Cambodia, Rwanda, Congo, Sudan—and incipient genocidiers who yearn to eliminate Israel and Judaism are labeled Human Rights activists.

The UN is a reichlet on American soil whose overwhelming financial support comes from the American taxpayer. That’s right, your hard-earned dollars support this brothel of hate.

I have an excellent idea.

Let’s relocate the UN to, say, happy go lucky Saudi Arabia or that island paradise of Cuba. I’m sure the UN delegates—a charming multicultural coalition of petrified Communists, IslamoNazis and murderous Third World thugs—will be thrilled to be on home ground in contrast to the, y’know, Zionist Occupied Jew York.

Here’s a fine word-graphic video that lays it all out:

YouTube Preview Image

H/T Elder of Ziyon

This entry was posted in Jew-haters, U.N. and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comment Rules


Seraphic Secret is private property, that's right, it's an extension of our home, and as such, Karen and I have instituted two Seraphic Rules and we ask commentors to act respectfully.

  1. No profanity.
  2. No Israel bashing. We debate, we discuss, we are respectful. You know what Israel bashing is. The world is full of it. Seraphic Secret is one of the few places in the world that will not tolerate this form of anti-Semitism.

That's it. Break either of these rules and you will be banned.


12 Comments

  1. Miranda Rose Smith
    Posted July 15, 2011 at 12:25 am | Permalink

    I’ve been saying for years that Mayor Bloomberg should invoke Kelo vs. New London and get the U.N. off those 18 acres of river view, centrally located Manhattan real estate. Shabbat Shalom.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

    • Bill Brandt
      Posted July 15, 2011 at 5:37 am | Permalink

      I think The Rockefeller family  gave the land to the UN

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  2. K
    Posted July 14, 2011 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

    I’ve always thought the UN be moved away from the United States, to a place wise men and international treaties have set aside for the all the people of earth.
    The moon.
     
     

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

  3. Bill Brandt
    Posted July 14, 2011 at 7:59 pm | Permalink

    To think that the UN was a creation of the US and the hopes we had…..

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1

  4. Posted July 14, 2011 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    Some rather good news from Oz.
    Whereas our retired conservative leaders aspire to leadership of things like the International Cricket Council, our Labor leaders and foreign ministers start planning for UN positions long before retiring from local politics. The latest case has been that of Kevin Rudd, dumped as PM by his own party and serving as foreign minister for the last year. He is notorious as a frenzied traveller with an enormous capacity for futile or counter-productive work. His UN aspirations are costing us by the day, his erratic and self-serving posturing cannot be curbed because our hated PM can’t risk sacking such a vindictive and volatile colleague in a hung parliament, where her power hangs by a thread.
    Nonetheless, this same busy fool, Kevin Rudd, has done something noble this week. I don’t know or care if he has an angle. Maybe he just has a sense of history, and understands the implications of the arbitrary picketing and boycotting of a Jewish place of business.
    This won’t help his UN aspirations, but if he wants a handshake from me, he’ll get it.
    http://www.theage.com.au/national/citizen-rudds-sweet-support-for-cafe-20110714-1hg3l.html#ixzz1S7B2EFXt

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

  5. reg
    Posted July 14, 2011 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    The best description of the UN i’ve heard is from Mark Steyn” if you mix a pint of dogs*&t with a gallon of ice cream, it will taste more like the former than the latter”.
    Yes indeed, give them what they profess to wish for. League of Nations, United Nations   potato potahto. 

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1

  6. exdemexlib
    Posted July 14, 2011 at 11:26 am | Permalink

    The UN is a reichlet on American soil whose overwhelming financial support comes from the American taxpayer

    I like your idea!  Here’s a similar one:

    In order help with the budget and not raise the debt ceiling, maybe the first spending cut can be to discontinue all UN funding, call in all unpaid debts from the UN to America,and create new jobs and revenue by turning the riverfront building with the beautiful view into condos. (I think Trump might be approachable to buy it …)

    (or , if liberals really don’t want to hear about anything so reasonable,
    then at least let it serve some good and make it into a homeless shelter for battered and abused third-world women.)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1

  7. LukeHandCool
    Posted July 14, 2011 at 11:24 am | Permalink

    So … what you’re trying to say is that the innocent international-goodwill esprit-de-corps rush I’d enjoy on that little boat ride with my small children … cheerfully greeted in different languages, entertained by dancing dolls representing the world’s kids, the last hopeful strains of the uplifting song still audible as we were bid farewell, again in different languages … that is not transferrable to the adult version of the “international community” in the form of that beautiful building with all those lovely flags? I mean … all those lovely flags … just like all those lovely dolls … do we really need to look beyond all those lovely flags? (No flag being lovelier or superior to any other flag, of course.) 

    What a buzzkill.

    But I know many snarky hipsters wearing the coolest un-ironed ironic t-shirts who say the problem … (ssshh … lean in really close) … they say the problem is that it is a small world, indeed, and Israel is Chucky !!!!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

  8. Johnny
    Posted July 14, 2011 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    the UN is Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity church on a global scale:
     
    Wrong!  I’ve seen speeches at the U.N. by great leaders and human beings like Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan.  I’ll bet the corner brothel in New Orleans has seen better speakers than Trinity.  Trinity is the world’s mosques every Friday writ small. 
     
    When people attribute human characteristics to animals you get anthropomorphism.  When Democratic countries attribute democratic principles to governments that are not answerable to their citizens we get the U.N.  Of course if all countries were democracies there wouldn’t be a need for a U.N.
     
    Put the U.N. in North Korea or Saudi Arabia and it will go the way of the League of Nations.  Instead of a posting at the U.N. being a desired plum, countries would have to empty their prisons to find some people willing to represent them in N. Korea.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

    • Pax ad Israelum
      Posted July 14, 2011 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

      I bet the corner brothel in New Orleans has seen the same speakers as Wright’s church (zing!).
       
      I like the idea of the UN, in theory, but we stupidly gave the Soviets and their puppets representation (maybe we couldn’t have refused, what with their help in the war, but I think Yalta shows just how little we even tried). And they, and their friends in Western countries, proceeded to pack every UN agency with Communists and fellow-travelers.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

      • Johnny
        Posted July 14, 2011 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

        Pax:
         
        I’ve been to New Orleans many many times (though I’ve never enjoyed any time at a House of the Rising Sun) and I think you demean their brothels.  They would never let a Phlegger or Wright through their doors.  After all, they have standards to maintain.
         
        It says a lot when our president comes from a church that is less reputable than a house of ill repute.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1

    • Miranda Rose Smith
      Posted July 15, 2011 at 1:13 am | Permalink

      Dear Johnny: I wouldn’t call Margaret Thatcher great. She opposed Israel’s 1982 invasion of Lebanon. Don’t forget, among great human beings who spoke at the U.N., Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Menachem Begin, may they both rest in peace. 

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1

2 Trackbacks

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting