
In March 2011, Vogue magazine ran a gushing profile of Syria’s totalitarian first couple Asma Assad and her husband Bashar al-Assad. Syria, we noted, is a military dictatorship that routinely tortures and murders its own citizens. It is also an openly Jew-hating state that has vowed on numerous occasions to annihilate Israel. For Joan Juliet Buck to write such a flattering profile of a butcher and his accomplice wife was almost surrealistic, a Brooksian “Springtime for Hitler.”
As Syria descended into civil war and Assad openly murdered scores of his own people Vogue magazine quietly scrubbed the article from its website.
Seraphic Secret saved and reprinted the article because we knew that sooner or later events would catch up with Vogue. We wanted to make sure the story did not get flushed down the memory hole like so much Communist propaganda.
Yesterday, the New York Times ran a lengthy article about the favorable PR enjoyed in the west by the Assads. The story focuses on Barbara Walters, Joan Juliet Buck and Anna Wintour and their enabling of this murderous regime.
The article seems to imply—it’s written in this gee-it-could-happen-to-anybody style—that these fervent Obama supporters were well-intentioned but ultimately duped by well oiled PR machines.
This is standard liberal apologia where the individual refuses to take responsibilty for their actions. Thus they present themselves as victims, blameless for the evil they help perpetuate.
In short, the NY Times article is PR for the power of PR—and the moral collapse of post-modern liberals.
There is one line that had us in stitches:
But she [Joan Juliet Buck] said Mrs. Assad was “extremely thin and very well-dressed, and therefore qualified to be in Vogue.”
Hence my open letter:
Dear Joan Juliet Buck and Anna Wintour:
My wife Karen is extremely thin and very well-dressed. She is also a distinguished Psychologist with a Ph.D who does important work with troubled children.
Okay, Karen’s not a mass killer and neither is her husband, yours truly. But hey, you can’t have everything.
Please let us know when we can schedule an interview for your upcoming Vogue profile.
Seraphic Secret is republishing the entire NY Times story because we have a strong feeling that it too will be scrubbed from its website very soon.
Syria’s Assads Turned to West for Glossy P.R.
By BILL CARTER and AMY CHOZICK
For some journalists, Syria has been one of the least hospitable countries in the Middle East, a place where reporters — if they can get in — are routinely harassed and threatened as they try to uncover the repression that has propped up the Assad government for decades.
For other journalists, Syria has until recently been a country led by the cultivated, English-speaking President Bashar al-Assad who, along with his beautiful British-born wife, Asma, was helping usher in a new era of openness and prosperity.That second impression is no accident. With the help of high-priced public relations advisers who had worked in the Clinton, Bush and Thatcher administrations, the president and his family have sought over the past five years to portray themselves in the Western media as accessible, progressive and even glamorous.
Magazines and online outlets have published complimentary features about the family, often focusing on fashion and celebrity. In March 2011, just as Mr. Assad and his security forces initiated a brutal crackdown on political opponents that has led to the death of an estimated 10,000 Syrians, Vogue magazine ran a flattering profile of the first lady, describing her as walking “a determined swath cut through space with a flash of red soles,” a reference to her Christian Louboutin heels.
Fawning treatment of world leaders — particularly attractive Western-educated ones — is nothing new. But the Assads have been especially determined to burnish their image, and hired experts to do so. The family paid the Washington public relations firm Brown Lloyd James $5,000 a month to act as a liaison between Vogue and the first lady, according to the firm.
This web of politics and public relations ensnared Barbara Walters recently. After she conducted an aggressive interview with Mr. Assad on ABC News in December, she offered to provide recommendations for Sheherazad Jaafari, the president’s press aide and the daughter of the Syrian ambassador to the United Nations, who was applying for a job at CNN and admission to Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs.
Ms. Walters issued a statement on Tuesday expressing regret for her actions, which she called “a conflict.”
Ms. Jaafari, 22, who has been accepted by Columbia, had worked as an intern at Brown Lloyd James. Last year, she expressed her feelings about the Assad family in an e-mail to Mike Holtzman, a partner at the firm who, according to his online profile, advised the Clinton administration on trade issues and worked in the State Department during the Bush administration.
“I have always told you — this man is loved by his people,” Ms. Jaafari wrote in the e-mail, which was obtained by the British newspaper The Guardian. Mr. Holtzman replied: “I’m proud of you. Wish I were there to help.” Mr. Holtzman did not respond to numerous requests for comment.
The Assads were in many ways ripe for celebrity treatment by the news media. The president, who was trained as an ophthalmologist, received part of his education in Britain, where he met his wife, a Briton of Syrian descent who grew up in London and worked as an investment banker in New York.
Andrew Tabler, a Syria expert with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy who once worked for a charity sponsored by Mrs. Assad, summed up the appeal the Assads had for some news outlets: “He speaks English, and his wife is hot.”
The campaign to make the ruling family the face of a more Westernized and open Syria began in 2006, when Mrs. Assad approached the public relations firm Bell Pottinger in London.
Tim Bell, a co-founder of the firm and a former media adviser to Margaret Thatcher, said Mrs. Assad contacted the firm after several first ladies, including Laura Bush, began to hold annual meetings and conferences.
“She wanted to be a part of that club,” he said in a phone interview.
Bell Pottinger did not set up interviews for Mrs. Assad directly, but advised her on how to set up a communications office in Damascus to help shape her image.
A few years later, positive articles began to appear. Paris Match called Mrs. Assad an “element of light in a country full of shadow zones” and the “eastern Diana.” French Elle counted her among the best-dressed women in world politics, and in 2009, The Huffington Post published an article and fashion slide show titled “Asma al-Assad: Syria’s First Lady and All-Natural Beauty.”
“She responded beautifully, because she speaks well and is beautiful,” said the Italian writer Gaia Servadio, who worked for Mrs. Assad in Damascus. She added that Mrs. Assad hoped the coverage would deflect some of the negative attention her country had received.
None of the articles about Mrs. Assad struck a nerve quite like the 3,200-word March 2011 profile in Vogue titled “A Rose in the Desert.” In it, the writer, Joan Juliet Buck, called Mrs. Assad “the freshest and most magnetic of first ladies.”
In a phone interview, Ms. Buck said that shortly after the profile was published, she began “steadily speaking out against the Assad regime,” including in an interview with Piers Morgan on CNN and elsewhere. In April, on National Public Radio, Ms. Buck said she regretted the headline that Vogue put on the article. But she said Mrs. Assad was “extremely thin and very well-dressed, and therefore qualified to be in Vogue.”
This spring, the magazine removed the article from its Web site. On Sunday, Anna Wintour, the editor of Vogue, issued a statement about the article saying, in part: “Like many at that time, we were hopeful that the Assad regime would be open to a more progressive society. Subsequent to our interview, as the terrible events of the past year and a half unfolded in Syria, it became clear that its priorities and values were completely at odds with those of Vogue. The escalating atrocities in Syria are unconscionable and we deplore the actions of the Assad regime in the strongest possible terms.”
Even among the world’s most repressive governments, Syria stands out in its treatment of journalists. The only way for many reporters to cover news emerging from the bloody crackdown on dissidents is to sneak into the country — often putting their lives at risk.
According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, 13 reporters have been killed in Syria since November, including Marie Colvin, a veteran war correspondent from Long Island. (Anthony Shadid of The New York Times died of an asthma attack during a clandestine reporting trip to Syria.) Syrian officials have denied targeting journalists, but state media outlets have said that foreign reporters killed in Syria “must be spies or have links to terrorist organizations.”
Ms. Walters, who has a lifetime of experience chasing and winning interviews with world leaders, said she spent six years establishing a relationship with the Syrian ambassador to the United Nations, Bashar Jaafari, including once dining at his home.
The connection eventually paid off. “Assad decided he would do an interview; according to the ambassador, he had requests from all over the world,” Ms. Walters said in a telephone interview last week. “And he chose to do it with me, based on the recommendation of the ambassador, and also because I had been to Syria twice before and knew something of its background and history.”
Joel Simon, executive director of the Committee to Protect Journalists, said this kind of interview is highly sought after. “In a strange way, political leaders, presidents and prime ministers who are highly repressive and restrictive are good ‘gets’ for these types of interviews, precisely because there’s no fair media coverage in their countries,” he said.
Ms. Walters’ interview, broadcast in December, made worldwide news, with Mr. Assad issuing claims that he was not responsible for the Syrian military and that people were not being killed by his government.
Ms. Walters said, “I went to Syria and conducted what was a very tough and strong interview that President Assad did not like.”
But her offer of help to the ambassador’s daughter has cast a shadow on that interview. Two people close to Ms. Walters said she had reacted to a plea from Ms. Jaafari for help because Ms. Jaafari was being removed from her position as a media adviser to the Syrian president.
Mr. Tabler said that he didn’t “find it surprising what Walters did for her.” The issue, he said, was the timing.
“At that point, how many had been killed — 7,000?” he said. “This is an attractive young woman, and she speaks English. Maybe you help her with an introduction. To get beyond that is a little difficult to swallow.”
I caught this early this morn, just as I’d seen the piece on the Sydney Morning Herald (Australia’s NYT) website.
I like your open letter, Robert, I think all Seraphic Secret readers should do likewise. For my part – “I am a scion of Irish kings, my family name dates to the fifth century. My ancestor Hugh O’Neill fought the good fight against the English invaders.”
Hmm, good start, but mentioning that my grandad was a trade union organiser who fought, sometimes very physically, against the communists, might blow it. If not that, then my agreement with Johnny Ramone’s statement that “all rock and roll bands should be Republicans” would seal the deal.
Blooming heck, even John Lennon sang “But when you talk about destruction
Don’t you know that you can count me out”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzCjGgrewYY
Earl:
But were your ancestors extremely thin and well dressed?
I can’t speak for my distant ancestors Robert, but I used to be. Now I’m just well-dressed. 😉
Eva Braun was thin and stylish too – wonder if they will do an article on her. It is funny with these things – when you do shine the light they scurry out of the room like – well, you know what I mean 😉
A tough observaton. It makes sense in so many ways.
Eva was, by all accounts, sort of stupid and disconnected from politics. Asma Assad knows exactly what’s going on. And even as her husband slaughters her countrymen she has been ordering Louboutins from Paris.
Asma may be brighter than Eva, but their role in society seems quite similar.
Boy, I’m going to New York and sell Wintour and Buck a big bridge connecting Brooklyn and Manhattan. I’d say my odds are pretty good and they won’t even haggle about the price. Wintour and Buck may be the only people on earth that were duped about the Assads (maybe the clue should have been his last name is the same as his dictator dad).
Boy, if only Buck and Wintour could have been running the magazine back in the 1930s – Charles Lindbergh and Joe Kennedy could have talked them into running a story about Adolf and his thin girlfriend Eva. Forget what was written in his book or the 25 point plan of the National Socialists.
Carter and Chozick must be hoping to get a job at Vogue after the next round of layoffs and buyouts at the NY Times.
Johnny:
Of course, Wintour hosted a fundraiser for Obama that raised millions. Her political judgement has never been more transparent.
There is a lot more to fear from the Syrian rebels than from Assad. These are the same Islamic radicals that we foolishly supported in Libya, and indrectly in Egypt. There have been reports of foreigners fighting on their side, as in Iraq, as in Libya, as in Afghanistan, as in Chechnya, as in Bosnia, and on and on and on. It is madness for us to be supporting these people. The press pretends that they are helpless liberals, and calls them “activists.” But I have seen letters published on Peter Hitchens blog from peple living there who say that they are quite well-armed. The liberal press is squarely on the side of the Islamists in this fight, as they always are. But in fact, we would do far better with a corrupt non-Islamist like Assad than with the rebel fanatics.
Of course, of course.
Kishke:
Good point…wish they could both lose.
Me too. Or, better yet, that they fight forever. But the worst scenario is that the pretend “democrats” win. Yet, that’s the side being supported by the media and our government.
Kishke:
A plague on both their houses. There is no moral imperative to support either set of monsters.
I’m arguing from the standpoint of utility not morality. I think Israel will be better served by Assad remaining in power than in him losing to the rebels. I wouldn’t advocate active support for him, but just that we stand back and let them fight it out.
So, if Sara Netanyahu were thin, do you think Vogue would do a profile of her? I’m guessing not!
Franny:
Vogue is basically Pravda with much better outfits.
Robert:
I have taken the liberty of reposting the above n my Facebook page. Hope that meets with your approval.
Barry:
I am honored. Thanks so much.
Cute. Thank you.
Don’t forget that Wintour is also about to host a pricey event for Obama I believe this week. The same campaign that attacks Romney for being too rich and out-of-touch aligns itself with the very personification of Western cultural elitism and bourgeois nothingness. Check out the RNC’s great hatchet job on Wintour’s ad for Obama here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Huts_Ltt2CU
Jake:
Oh yeah, Anna has great political insight.