Warning: Hollywood’s Coming for Your Home and Children

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Jewish Action magazine has just published another of my articles about Hollywood as leftist propaganda machine. This time I focus on Hollywood and the family.

Screenwriter Clashes with Scary Hollywood Executive, Part I

The studio executive hated me.

Or at least, she hated a critical exchange in my script, A Stranger Among Us.

The scene is between Leah (Mia Sara), the seventeen-year-old daughter of a Chassidic rebbe, and Emily Eden (Melanie Griffith), a hardened New York City detective who sees herself as a happy, liberated woman.

Here’s the dialogue as it appears in the script:

Emily: And what do you want to be when you grow up, little Leah?

Leah: A wife, a mother.

Emily looks at Leah in shock.

Emily: That’s it?

Leah: But Emily, what could be more important?

Director Sidney Lumet works with Mia Sara and Melanie Griffith on the set of “A Stranger Among Us.”

Director Sidney Lumet (1924-2011) works with Mia Sara and Melanie Griffith on the set of “A Stranger Among Us.”

Of course, the point of the scene is to make Emily Eden, a super-feminist who claims to be “independent and spectacularly happy,” start to question the values underlying her life. The scene—and the entire narrative—suggest that Leah, an observant Jewish woman, is the one who is living a genuinely happy and fulfilled life.

At its core, A Stranger Among Us sets forth the idea that postmodern feminism is a false religion, another in the long line of social and psychological cults that have afflicted the Jewish people since ancient times.

To my studio executive, the exchange between Emily and Leah was downright heretical.

By this time, my script had a green light. Fully financed by the powerhouse Walt Disney Studios, it had already attracted the legendary Sidney Lumet, one of Hollywood’s most important directors. Melanie Griffith, a huge star at the time, had been signed to play Emily Eden, the hard-as-nails but emotionally vulnerable detective who goes undercover in the Chassidic community.

The Scary Studio Executive said: “Look, I know we’re set to go into production in three weeks and the script is locked. But I wonder, is this really the message we want to send to our audience?”

I could have told her that the script had been approved by our director and by her bosses, the powerful moguls Jeffrey Katzenberg and Michael Eisner. I could have said that if she was trying to get me to rewrite my script, she might want to ask those formidable guys first.

That response would have put an end to the issue immediately. But it also would have made her my mortal enemy, and it’s better not to make enemies of powerful Hollywood executives. And this woman—smart, witty and singularly well-connected—was on a fast trajectory to the top of the Hollywood elite.

“What exactly are you worried about?” I asked.

“Look, Robert, I like your script. But this scene undermines women and our fight for equal rights. With all due respect, I am Jewish and I happen to know that Orthodox men say a prayer every morning in which they thank God for not having made them women. Your whole scene endorses the patriarchal family structure that is totally regressive—with all due respect.”

(Note: In Hollywood, when someone says “with all due respect,” what they really mean is “with utter contempt.” Also, when someone uses words such as “patriarchal” and “regressive” in the same sentence, it’s a dead giveaway that he or she took courses in feminist theory and gender studies in college and has been—with all due respect—completely brainwashed.)

This Ivy League-educated young woman—whose father was one of the most powerful producers in Hollywood, who spent summers on her father’s yacht in the south of France, who flashed a solid gold Rolex on her wrist, who elegantly dressed in Armani blouses and skirts, who strutted about in nose-bleed Louboutin heels, who zoomed around Tinseltown in a Porsche that cost more than the average home in America and who was, natch, Jewish—was playing (goodness gracious!) the victim card.

Surprise! Hollywood Has Colonized Your Mind

The sanctity of the institution of marriage and the home shall be upheld.”

— The Motion Picture Production Code, 1934

In its early years, Hollywood told great stories and entertained millions of people, but it also influenced culture in an unprecedented manner.

In just a few short years, Hollywood—which had been founded by impoverished immigrant Jews—had become the most powerful instrument of propaganda on the world stage. It was well aware of its power. Louis B. Mayer, head of MGM, the most powerful and profitable Hollywood studio, was committed to producing uplifting films that advocated for American greatness and traditional family values.

Helen Ferguson as an impoverished Jewish immigrant on the lower East Side, “Hungry Hearts,” 1922.

Helen Ferguson as an impoverished Jewish immigrant on the lower East Side, “Hungry Hearts,” 1922.

During the silent era, Hollywood produced hundreds of movies that explored the everyday drama of family life. Many of them were about the experiences of Eastern European Jews who had immigrated to America and the profound effects of assimilation.

In movie after movie, Hollywood made the case for the nuclear family as the bedrock of civilization. Yes, there were gangsters, and yes, sometimes the American dream went terribly awry. But the Hollywood narratives always resolved the tortuous plot twists in a conclusion where marriage, home and family were the goals. Ultimately, it was the family that restored order and purpose to an often cruel and chaotic universe.

Screenwriter Clashes With Scary Hollywood Executive, Part II

To the Scary Studio Executive, I said: “Listen, I understand why you’re uncomfortable with the dialogue, with the message of the scene. It’s a world far from your consciousness. But imagine if this dialogue were set in an Amish community. Would you have the same objection? I think you’d be, y’know, culturally sensitive.”

“Robert, are you saying that I’m exercising a double standard because I’m Jewish?”

“Are you?”

She said nothing for a long moment. Then: “I hear you’re, like, seriously Orthodox.”

I nodded.

“So this story, these people, represent your world view.”

“True. But Emily Eden also represents my world view. I identify with her just as much as I identify with the Jewish characters. Look, this film has a very simple spine. It says that Emily Eden becomes a better woman because of her contact with the Chassidim. And the Chassidim become better Jews because of the time they spend with Emily.”

The scene was shot just as I wrote it.

John Wayne Is Dead; Long Live Tony Soprano

It was the sixties; Vietnam and the rise of the so-called Youth Culture had turned Hollywood from a vocal and influential advocate for Americanism and the traditional family into a cynical detractor of family values. In Easy Rider (1969), a hate song to the American heartland, the only family ever seen is a bunch of grimy hippies who live on a commune, take vast amounts of drugs and engage in promiscuous activities.

In Coming Home (1978), starring Jane Fonda and Jon Voight, an honorable Vietnam War veteran is demonized and his marriage viewed as politically illegitimate. Such attitudes increasingly became the norm in the new Hollywood, where classical liberalism gave way to poisonous leftism.

In the 1970s, the center of gravity and cultural influence shifted from film to television. TV still produced entertaining, traditional family shows such as Happy Days, The Partridge Family, Family Ties, Growing Pains and Little House on the Prairie. But with cable’s growing influence, the moral inversions that the liberal elite and the news media were promoting on American campuses roared to life on the TV screen. Hour-long dramas such as The Sopranos, Mad Men and Breaking Bad portray the family as a unit held together by a Gordian knot of crime, drugs, violence and infidelity. The protagonists of such grim dramas are known as anti-heroes. But the cult audience that is devoted to these shows does not see them as anti-heroes. They see them as surrogates for their darkest desires.

“Friday Night Lights,” Connie Britton, Aimee Teagarden, and Kyle Chandler.

“Friday Night Lights,” Connie Britton, Aimee Teagarden, and Kyle Chandler.

John Wayne is dead. Long live Tony Soprano. The single luminous exception to this revisionist morality was the NBC series Friday Night Lights. Exquisitely written, produced and cast, Friday Night Lights is ostensibly the story of the football-mad town of Dillon, Texas. But the true subject of this superb and riveting series is the marriage of Eric Taylor (Kyle Chandler), the coach of the high-school football team, and his wife, Tami (Connie Britton).

There has never been a more honest and loving portrayal of marriage and family life in the history of film and television. On top of the family’s constant money woes, Eric, a man of few words, must deal with the insane parents and town boosters who constantly pressure him to win at any cost. He and Tami, who is more social and outgoing, have a daughter in the throes of teenage rebellion and an infant who always needs a diaper change. Their house is too small, their mortgage too large. But they are in this marriage together and, like true Texans, they will endure whatever life throws at them.

Friday Night Lights—now canceled—is about how marriage works and doesn’t work. It’s about love and loyalty, how a decent family endures the endless challenges that are the stuff of life. Perhaps what sets the Taylors’ marriage apart from all the nihilism that passes for entertainment is their faith. Eric and Tami are churchgoing Christians who take their religion seriously. An awareness of God’s presence, says this series, makes a difference in how we live our lives.

Sadly, most series on the air and in development are unsubtle messages formulated by postmodern Hollywood writers, producers and executives. This is no longer mere propaganda, but a clarion call for a new national morality. It is a world where women do not need husbands to raise children, as in Playing House, where the most anticipated marriage on TV is between two men, as in Modern Family and where the ties that hold a family together are murder, rape and plunder, as in Vikings. The protagonists of The Americans, a Cold War drama, are a ruthless but attractive Soviet couple working as spies against America. In the hit Netflix series House of Cards, a Washington D.C. power couple, played to silkily sinister perfection by Kevin Spacey and Robin Wright, lie, cheat and murder their way into the White House. Blessedly, these repugnant American Borgias have chosen not to have children. But the show’s writers would have us believe that theirs is a glorious union.

In the new Hollywood lexicon, the family is a unit held together not by traditional family values, but by gangster ethics.

And of course, the rise of so-called reality television (spoiler alert: the shows are plotted and scripted) has given us The Real Housewives, a franchise that celebrates dysfunctional families and revels in stupidity, ignorance and vulgarity. The children of these narcissistic harridans and their emasculated husbands seem doomed.

“Duck Dynasty,” good and charitable people hiding in plain sight on the A&E network garner massive ratings.

“Duck Dynasty,” a traditional family hiding in plain sight on the A&E network, garners massive ratings.

It is a relief to note that one family on reality TV functions within a traditional framework. This is the Robertson family in Duck Dynasty, whose members are, not surprisingly, devoted and charitable Christians. Naturally, the far left has demonized Phil Robertson, the family patriarch, as a homophobe because he supports traditional marriage. But Duck Dynasty has such high ratings that A&E has resisted enormous pressure from homosexual radicals to cancel it.

Sadly, what we find too often in postmodern Hollywood is a tangle of social, religious and sexual pathologies being passed off as sophisticated entertainment.

There are several shows in development about married lesbians and married gays, plus a sitcom about an adorable soldier who just happens to be transgendered. Each of these shows is designed to condition a young generation of viewers, Skinner-box style, to a new version of family, redefining deviance as something to be celebrated.

Identity politics are what drive this trend away from the traditional family. In the new, progressive Hollywood, Judeo-Christian morals are empty vessels and marriage is redefined according to the whims of the loudest grievance group. Today it is militant homosexuals who drive the agenda. Tomorrow it will be sharia-yearning Islamists demanding sitcoms about happy-go-lucky polygamists, with child brides thrown into the wacky but lovable mix.

Postmodern Hollywood is a landscape of shifting morality where the traditional family is seen as a hateful, antiquated institution comparable to Jim Crow. Gender is fluid. Numbers are arbitrary. In this new moral calculus of Hollywood’s overeducated, overbred elites, family is whatever any number of consenting adults says it is.

The problem is obvious: if everything is family, nothing is family.

And Finally: Screenwriter Clashes With Scary Hollywood Executive, Part III

A few years later, I ran into the Scary Executive at a studio screening. She was married, and heavily pregnant.

Much to my surprise, she was delighted to see me.

She said, “I don’t know if you heard, but I married a man who converted to Judaism for me.”

“That’s great,” I said.

“The thing is, he’s getting serious. Really Jewy. Much more than me. In fact, he’s putting on those little boxy thingies every morning.”

“Tefillin.”

“Whatever. The thing is, he’s also saying . . . it.”

“It?”

“You know—that prayer thanking God for not making him a woman.”

I laughed. So did she, a scary studio executive no longer.

“Can you believe it? My husband is, like, totally regressive and patriarchal.”

I said, “Welcome to Hollywood.”

FADE TO BLACK

This entry was posted in Hollywood, Hollywood Stars, Hollywood: Then and Now, Screenwriting, Silent Movies and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

Comment Rules


Seraphic Secret is private property, that's right, it's an extension of our home, and as such, Karen and I have instituted two Seraphic Rules and we ask commentors to act respectfully.

  1. No profanity.
  2. No Israel bashing. We debate, we discuss, we are respectful. You know what Israel bashing is. The world is full of it. Seraphic Secret is one of the few places in the world that will not tolerate this form of anti-Semitism.

That's it. Break either of these rules and you will be banned.


10 Comments

  1. lee
    Posted December 5, 2014 at 5:52 pm | Permalink

    BTW, I really liked “A Stranger Among Us.”

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. lee
    Posted December 5, 2014 at 5:44 pm | Permalink

    I have a great idea for a TV show. Really. I told a friend of mine who works in television about it, and she thought it was great. She recommend I type it up, and she’d have me meet with her agent. I started to type it up, and then I started thinking, “It’ll just get ruined. It might start off the way I envisioned it, but if it survives one season, it’ll just get ruined — they’ll stray far afield from the story, they’ll go bonkers with a gay story line. They’ll work in too much graphic sex…”

    I just saved the file and never did anything with it. I still think it’d be fantastic idea for a serial. Really. Maybe if someone starts a good conservative cable network. A good Christian network would work, too. Someone who’d respect the source material. Then, I might polish up the proposal I started, call my friend about the agent…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Bill Brandt
    Posted December 4, 2014 at 9:44 pm | Permalink

    I am curious why the studio exec felt it important that her husband convert to Judaism but then is surprised when he wants to live by its tenets? Is it just a social club for some?

    And they wonder why viewership is down so much. Still can’t forget Touched By An Angel that had a good audience but CBS was determined to cancel it.

    It affirmed God’s love for us every week – one of the few programs that made me feel good.

    Your movie Robert made me feel good. It was wonderful to see Griffith’s character change with her undercover work.

    No longer content for a weekend meaningless fling with another detective, she wanted her bashert (basherta?)

    I wish I had known about Friday Night Lights

    To tell you the truth I have virtually given up on Network TV.

    The only thing I leave Netflix for is Fridays for Blue Bloods

    That is an affirming program.

    For me Network TV is almost dead. Wish I had known about Friday Night Lights. People who produce those kinds of shows should be supported –

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

    • Barry
      Posted December 4, 2014 at 10:36 pm | Permalink

      Just plain, old fashioned, good thinking.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    • Robert J. Avrech
      Posted December 5, 2014 at 8:14 am | Permalink

      Bill:

      I’m glad you enjoyed my film.

      Friday Night Lights is available through cable reruns, Netflix, Hula, and Amazon.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  4. kgbudge
    Posted December 4, 2014 at 11:53 am | Permalink

    Good stuff.

    I gotta admit I’m curious to learn more about this morning prayer. I have a feeling its meaning, in context, is not quite as Scary Hollywood Executive described it.

    Also cannot help chuckling that Leia Organa’s bun hairdoo was apparently not so futuristic after all.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  5. covvie
    Posted December 4, 2014 at 9:52 am | Permalink

    What a wise response to this studio exec, on a number of levels.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  6. kohana
    Posted December 3, 2014 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    I loved this. Will post a link to your page in Ricochet.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  7. sennacherib
    Posted December 3, 2014 at 10:05 am | Permalink

    ” Really Jewy”. LOL
    Ah Sennacherib has not had a laugh that good since, since we made the Amakalites run for the hills.

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

  8. Posted December 3, 2014 at 7:32 am | Permalink

    Oh, the delicious irony…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

  • How I Married Karen

    The new book
    by Robert J. Avrech


    Available in All Major Book Stores

    Buy this e-book for your Kindle from Amazon!
    Buy this e-book in the iBookStore!
    Buy this e-book in the iBookStore!

    Adobe Digital Edition's version is available through the Lulu store!

    Support independent publishing: Buy this e-book on Lulu.

  • Follow Me on Pinterest
  • Subscribe to Seraphic Press via Email

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.



  •  

    Annual Ariel Avrech
    Memorial Lectures

    Young Israel of Century City

    Fourteenth: June 11, 2016
    Daniel Greenfield: “Fighting Anti-Semitism and Defending Israel in the Age of BDS.”

    Blog Post
    MP3 Audio Stereo (100 MB)
    Thirteenth: May 22, 2016
    Ben Shapiro: “How You Can Save Israel”

    Blog Post
    MP3 Audio Stereo (70 MB)
    Twelfth: June 7, 2015
    Larry Elder: “The New Black Anti-Semitism”

    Blog Post
    MP3 Audio Mono (50 MB) | Stereo (100 MB)
    Eleventh: June 8, 2014
    Michael Medved: “Shifting Alliances: Why Liberals No Longer Reliably Support Israel — And Conservatives Do.”

    Blog Post | Audio (mp3 97MB)
    Tenth: June 9, 2013
    David Horowitz: “The War Against Judaism on the University Campus.”

    Blog Post | Audio (mp3 16MB)
    Ninth: June 3, 2012
    Joel B. Pollak: “The Mainstream Media’s Betrayal of Israel.”

    Blog Post | Audio (mp3 15MB)
    Eighth: June 5, 2011
    Yossi Klein Halevi: “What is Expected of a Survivor People: Lessons My Father Taught Me.”

    Blog Post | Audio (mp3 18MB)
    Seventh: June 13, 2010
    Dennis Prager: “Happiness is a Mitzvah, Not an Emotion.”

    Blog Post | Audio (mp3 80MB)
    Sixth: June 21, 2009
    Rabbi Steven Pruzansky: “Conformity in Jewish Life: Vice, Virtue or Affectation?”

    Blog Post | Audio (mp3 64MB)
    Fifth: June 15, 2008
    Rabbi Dr. Gil S. Perl: “What Was the Rosh Yeshiva Reading: Intellectual Openness in 19th Century Lithuania.”

    Blog Post | Audio (mp3 70MB)
  • Tags

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Friends

    Hollywood

    Politics, Bloggers & News

  • Hitmap